public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/65078] [5.0 Regression] 4.9 and 5.0 generate more spill-fill in comparison with 4.8.2
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 14:40:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-65078-4-CzrGT2UT7g@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-65078-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65078

--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
Similar to PR21182 ?

As suggested in the above PR, does "-fschedule-insns -fsched-pressure" make any
difference?
>From gcc-bugs-return-477432-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Feb 16 14:43:40 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-477432-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17012 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2015 14:43:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16981 invoked by uid 48); 16 Feb 2015 14:43:37 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/65078] [5.0 Regression] 4.9 and 5.0 generate more spill-fill in comparison with 4.8.2
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 14:43:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ra
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords cf_gcctarget cc
Message-ID: <bug-65078-4-Lva18y5mxF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65078-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65078-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg01765.txt.bz2
Content-length: 547

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?ide078

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |ra
             Target|                            |i?86-*-*
                 CC|                            |vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Seems LRA does a very bad job here for some reason.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-02-16 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-16 14:17 [Bug rtl-optimization/65078] New: " ysrumyan at gmail dot com
2015-02-16 14:19 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/65078] " ysrumyan at gmail dot com
2015-02-16 14:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-16 14:40 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com [this message]
2015-02-16 14:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-16 14:44 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-16 14:50 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-18 17:15 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/65078] [5 " law at redhat dot com
2015-03-17 10:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-17 11:05 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-17 12:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-17 15:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-18 10:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-18 11:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-65078-4-CzrGT2UT7g@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).