public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/65078] [5.0 Regression] 4.9 and 5.0 generate more spill-fill in comparison with 4.8.2 Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 14:44:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-65078-4-q6DZFMc38l@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-65078-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65078 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #3) > Similar to PR21182 ? > > As suggested in the above PR, does "-fschedule-insns -fsched-pressure" make > any difference? No. >From gcc-bugs-return-477435-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Feb 16 14:47:12 2015 Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-477435-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org> Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22504 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2015 14:47:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org> List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org> Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22475 invoked by uid 48); 16 Feb 2015 14:47:09 -0000 From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/64812] [4.9 regression] x86 LibreOffice Build failure: undefined reference to acquire Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 14:47:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_gcctarget bug_status cc component cf_known_to_fail Message-ID: <bug-64812-4-HUK84EGzph@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-64812-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-64812-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg01768.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1627 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idd812 Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target|i?86-*-* | Status|WAITING |NEW CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org Component|regression |ipa Known to fail| |5.0 --- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> --- markus@x4 tmp % cat fmgridif.ii template <class T> class A { T *p; public: A (T *p1) : p (p1) { p->acquire (); } }; class B { public: virtual void acquire (); }; class D : public B { }; class F : B { int mrContext; }; class WindowListenerMultiplexer : F, public D { void acquire () { acquire (); } }; class C { void createPeer () throw (); WindowListenerMultiplexer maWindowListeners; }; class FmXGridPeer { public: void addWindowListener (A<D>); } a; void C::createPeer () throw () { a.addWindowListener (&maWindowListeners); } markus@x4 tmp % g++ -Os -c fmgridif.ii && nm --demangle fmgridif.o | grep WindowListenerMultiplexer U non-virtual thunk to WindowListenerMultiplexer::acquire() markus@x4 tmp % g++ -O2 -c fmgridif.ii && nm --demangle fmgridif.o | grep WindowListenerMultiplexer 0000000000000000 W WindowListenerMultiplexer::acquire() 0000000000000010 W non-virtual thunk to WindowListenerMultiplexer::acquire() Not sure if the devirtualization is valid. Honza?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-16 14:44 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2015-02-16 14:17 [Bug rtl-optimization/65078] New: " ysrumyan at gmail dot com 2015-02-16 14:19 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/65078] " ysrumyan at gmail dot com 2015-02-16 14:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-16 14:40 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2015-02-16 14:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-16 14:44 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2015-02-16 14:50 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-18 17:15 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/65078] [5 " law at redhat dot com 2015-03-17 10:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-17 11:05 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-17 12:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-17 15:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-18 10:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-18 11:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-65078-4-q6DZFMc38l@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).