From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-478673-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13040 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2015 06:46:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12947 invoked by uid 48); 27 Feb 2015 06:46:19 -0000
From: "m.zakirov at samsung dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/65088] Does GCC has load/store widening phase?
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 08:27:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: m.zakirov at samsung dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-65088-4-Z3lf4Vgd4U@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65088-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65088-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg03005.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65088

--- Comment #3 from Marat Zakirov <m.zakirov at samsung dot com> ---
> I think this has been discussed on the gcc mailing list

Marek could you please share some resuting conclusion at least for x86
platform?
Why didn't x86 GCC RTL fold these loads/stores?