From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-496508-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 124112 invoked by alias); 7 Sep 2015 09:57:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 124057 invoked by uid 48); 7 Sep 2015 09:57:16 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/65089] FAIL: gfortran.dg/io_real_boz(2|_[45]).f90 when tested with -fsanitize=address
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 09:57:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-65089-4-90rF1nzSWC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65089-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65089-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg00486.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65089

--- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> Fixed on trunk.  It would be good to backport to 5.2 and probably 4.9.x

IMO 4.9 is almost EOL and is not worth the trouble. What is the plan for 5.3?