public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "hp at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/65093] 26_numerics/random/binomial_distribution/operators/values.cc times out on slow targets
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 19:41:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-65093-4-AsjF3nIBfe@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-65093-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65093
Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #1)
> (It's just odd that no FAIL has been observed before, as the test itself
> hasn't changed for quite some time, like 1.5 year since the last two
> camel-back-breaking subtests were added.)
The test was enabled relatively recently for my autotesters, for the 4.9 branch
as late as 2014-12-17 (c:a r218800) and for trunk about 2015-02-15 (c:a
r220715). This happened automatically. The cause is most probably an update
of newlib, to a version with the pieces missing for dg-require-cstdint or
dg-require-cmath to be true. Automatic updates only happen when the branch is
regression-free and only if the results after a tentative update would still be
regression-free. There's no specific log event for tests that pass after an
update.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-19 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-17 18:15 [Bug middle-end/65093] New: [5 Regression] 26_numerics/random/binomial_distribution/operators/values.cc times out hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-18 11:14 ` [Bug middle-end/65093] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-18 11:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-19 1:22 ` [Bug testsuite/65093] 26_numerics/random/binomial_distribution/operators/values.cc times out on slow targets hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-19 19:30 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-19 19:41 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-65093-4-AsjF3nIBfe@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).