public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug regression/65121] New: long_call attribute broken weak symbol arm_none_eabi
@ 2015-02-19 15:06 Alex.Velenko at arm dot com
2015-02-19 15:54 ` [Bug target/65121] [5 regression] long_call attribute broken weak symbol arm* ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alex.Velenko at arm dot com @ 2015-02-19 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65121
Bug ID: 65121
Summary: long_call attribute broken weak symbol arm_none_eabi
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: regression
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: Alex.Velenko at arm dot com
CC: ramana.radhakrishnan at arm dot com, rth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target: arm-none-eabi
Patch r220684 changed behaviour of varasm.c:default_binds_local_p, which
affected
behavior of gcc/config/arm/arm.c:arm_function_in_section_p and through it
breaks gcc/config/arm/arm.c:arm_is_long_call_p for weak symbols.
As a result, I get regression for gcc.target/arm/long-calls-1.c on
arm-none-eabi:
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/long-calls-1.c scan-assembler-not \tbl?\tweak_l1\n
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/long-calls-1.c scan-assembler-not \tbl?\tweak_l3\n
Corresponding mailing thread:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg01114.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug target/65121] [5 regression] long_call attribute broken weak symbol arm* 2015-02-19 15:06 [Bug regression/65121] New: long_call attribute broken weak symbol arm_none_eabi Alex.Velenko at arm dot com @ 2015-02-19 15:54 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-19 17:27 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org ` (3 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-19 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65121 Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target|arm-none-eabi |arm* Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2015-02-19 CC| |ramana at gcc dot gnu.org Component|regression |target Summary|long_call attribute broken |[5 regression] long_call |weak symbol arm_none_eabi |attribute broken weak | |symbol arm* Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I'd expect this to fail on arm-none-linux-gnueabi(hf) too. Confirmed. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/65121] [5 regression] long_call attribute broken weak symbol arm* 2015-02-19 15:06 [Bug regression/65121] New: long_call attribute broken weak symbol arm_none_eabi Alex.Velenko at arm dot com 2015-02-19 15:54 ` [Bug target/65121] [5 regression] long_call attribute broken weak symbol arm* ramana at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-19 17:27 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-09 14:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: rth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-19 17:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65121 --- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson <rth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Created attachment 34808 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34808&action=edit proposed patch Also remove a silly test vs TREE_STATIC that is only relevant to VAR_DECL, not FUNCTION_DECL. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/65121] [5 regression] long_call attribute broken weak symbol arm* 2015-02-19 15:06 [Bug regression/65121] New: long_call attribute broken weak symbol arm_none_eabi Alex.Velenko at arm dot com 2015-02-19 15:54 ` [Bug target/65121] [5 regression] long_call attribute broken weak symbol arm* ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-19 17:27 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-03-09 14:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-09 15:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-09 15:20 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-03-09 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65121 Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|--- |5.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/65121] [5 regression] long_call attribute broken weak symbol arm* 2015-02-19 15:06 [Bug regression/65121] New: long_call attribute broken weak symbol arm_none_eabi Alex.Velenko at arm dot com ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2015-03-09 14:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-03-09 15:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-09 15:20 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-03-09 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65121 Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- So, what is the status of testing this? It passed bootstrap/regtest here for armv7hl-linux, no regressions. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/65121] [5 regression] long_call attribute broken weak symbol arm* 2015-02-19 15:06 [Bug regression/65121] New: long_call attribute broken weak symbol arm_none_eabi Alex.Velenko at arm dot com ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2015-03-09 15:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-03-09 15:20 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-03-09 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65121 --- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Author: ramana Date: Mon Mar 9 15:19:20 2015 New Revision: 221282 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221282&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix PR number for 65121 in Changelog. PR target/65121 The commit that fixed this was https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2015-03/msg00140.html Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-03-09 15:20 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-02-19 15:06 [Bug regression/65121] New: long_call attribute broken weak symbol arm_none_eabi Alex.Velenko at arm dot com 2015-02-19 15:54 ` [Bug target/65121] [5 regression] long_call attribute broken weak symbol arm* ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-19 17:27 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-09 14:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-09 15:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-09 15:20 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).