From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25337 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2015 09:09:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24474 invoked by uid 55); 23 Feb 2015 09:09:06 -0000 From: "rguenther at suse dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/65136] [5 Regression] VRP inserts unnecessary constant copy in the loop Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 10:00:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg02473.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D65136 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 20 Feb 2015, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D65136 >=20 > --- Comment #6 from Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > > After the patch the assembly difference between 4.9 and 5 is >=20 > Hm, I don't see the difference with -O2, 4.9.3 vs. 5.0: Must be local patches in my tree then. >>From gcc-bugs-return-478145-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Feb 23 09:51:56 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30950 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2015 09:51:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30897 invoked by uid 48); 23 Feb 2015 09:51:50 -0000 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug sanitizer/65148] ICE: in get_biv_step, at loop-iv.c:823 Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 10:18:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg02477.txt.bz2 Content-length: 179 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65148 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Works for me on x86_64, so probably also latent on trunk?