public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/65222] New: [5 Regression] -mtune= or -march=: Not all options not documented: slm, knl, shanghai, istanbul
@ 2015-02-26 13:59 burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-09 14:42 ` [Bug target/65222] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-26 13:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65222
Bug ID: 65222
Summary: [5 Regression] -mtune= or -march=: Not all options not
documented: slm, knl, shanghai, istanbul
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: documentation
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
At least the following options for -mtune= or -march= are not documented:
slm, knl, shanghai, istanbul
Marked as regression as "knl" is new since GCC 5. "slm" should be simple as it
is an alias of "silvermont" (new since GCC 4.9). "shanghai" and "istanbul" seem
to exist since GCC 4.8.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/65222] [5 Regression] -mtune= or -march=: Not all options not documented: slm, knl, shanghai, istanbul
2015-02-26 13:59 [Bug target/65222] New: [5 Regression] -mtune= or -march=: Not all options not documented: slm, knl, shanghai, istanbul burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-03-09 14:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-09 17:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-03-09 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65222
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target| |x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/65222] [5 Regression] -mtune= or -march=: Not all options not documented: slm, knl, shanghai, istanbul
2015-02-26 13:59 [Bug target/65222] New: [5 Regression] -mtune= or -march=: Not all options not documented: slm, knl, shanghai, istanbul burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-09 14:42 ` [Bug target/65222] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-03-09 17:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-18 13:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-18 13:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-03-09 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65222
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hjl.tools at gmail dot com,
| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
istanbul and shanghai don't seem to be valid -march=/-mtune= options.
My understanding was that
atom, core-avx2, core-avx-i, corei7, corei7-avx, slm
are deprecated aliases (thus intentionally not documented) of
bonell, haswell, ivybridge, nehalem, sandybridge, silvermont.
Beyond that, knl is indeed not documented (should be fixed) and x86-64 (dunno).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/65222] [5 Regression] -mtune= or -march=: Not all options not documented: slm, knl, shanghai, istanbul
2015-02-26 13:59 [Bug target/65222] New: [5 Regression] -mtune= or -march=: Not all options not documented: slm, knl, shanghai, istanbul burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-09 14:42 ` [Bug target/65222] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-09 17:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-03-18 13:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-18 13:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-03-18 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65222
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 18 13:47:47 2015
New Revision: 221489
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221489&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/65222
* doc/invoke.texi: Add knl as x86 -march=/-mtune= CPU type.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/65222] [5 Regression] -mtune= or -march=: Not all options not documented: slm, knl, shanghai, istanbul
2015-02-26 13:59 [Bug target/65222] New: [5 Regression] -mtune= or -march=: Not all options not documented: slm, knl, shanghai, istanbul burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2015-03-18 13:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-03-18 13:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-03-18 13:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65222
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
knl is now documented, slm (and various others) intentionally not documented,
shanghai and instanbul not even supported -march=/-mtune= options.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-03-18 13:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-02-26 13:59 [Bug target/65222] New: [5 Regression] -mtune= or -march=: Not all options not documented: slm, knl, shanghai, istanbul burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-09 14:42 ` [Bug target/65222] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-09 17:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-18 13:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-18 13:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).