public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/65222] New: [5 Regression] -mtune= or -march=: Not all options not documented: slm, knl, shanghai, istanbul
@ 2015-02-26 13:59 burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-03-09 14:42 ` [Bug target/65222] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-26 13:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65222

            Bug ID: 65222
           Summary: [5 Regression] -mtune= or -march=: Not all options not
                    documented: slm, knl, shanghai, istanbul
           Product: gcc
           Version: 5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: documentation
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

At least the following options for -mtune= or -march= are not documented:

slm, knl, shanghai, istanbul

Marked as regression as "knl" is new since GCC 5. "slm" should be simple as it
is an alias of "silvermont" (new since GCC 4.9). "shanghai" and "istanbul" seem
to exist since GCC 4.8.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-03-18 13:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-02-26 13:59 [Bug target/65222] New: [5 Regression] -mtune= or -march=: Not all options not documented: slm, knl, shanghai, istanbul burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-09 14:42 ` [Bug target/65222] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-09 17:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-18 13:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-18 13:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).