From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-478758-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 78207 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2015 15:35:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 78164 invoked by uid 48); 27 Feb 2015 15:35:16 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/65235] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Simplifying vec_select of vec_concat miscompiles when first element of vec_concat is const_int
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:20:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-65235-4-etItr7PoEk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65235-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65235-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg03090.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65235

--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #1)
> Hi.  The known to work field is empty.  Is this a regression?
> 
> I can't reproduce on a cross build to --target=aarch64-linux by running cc1.
> What options causes this to fail?  Could you post a preprocessed file for
> the test?

-O2 does it for me. I didn't try anything earlier than 4.8 (since they're not
maintained) but the offending code has been there since 2005:
6516cbaf (bonzini        2005-12-16 09:24:19 +0000 3551)          rtx vec =
trueop0;
6516cbaf (bonzini        2005-12-16 09:24:19 +0000 3552)          int offset =
INTVAL (XVECEXP (trueop1, 0, 0)) * GET_MODE_SIZE (mode);
6516cbaf (bonzini        2005-12-16 09:24:19 +0000 3553) 
6516cbaf (bonzini        2005-12-16 09:24:19 +0000 3554)          /* Try to
find the element in the VEC_CONCAT.  */
6516cbaf (bonzini        2005-12-16 09:24:19 +0000 3555)          while
(GET_MODE (vec) != mode
6516cbaf (bonzini        2005-12-16 09:24:19 +0000 3556)                 &&
GET_CODE (vec) == VEC_CONCAT)
6516cbaf (bonzini        2005-12-16 09:24:19 +0000 3557)            {
6516cbaf (bonzini        2005-12-16 09:24:19 +0000 3558)             
HOST_WIDE_INT vec_size = GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (XEXP (vec, 0)));
6516cbaf (bonzini        2005-12-16 09:24:19 +0000 3559)              if
(offset < vec_size)
6516cbaf (bonzini        2005-12-16 09:24:19 +0000 3560)                vec =
XEXP (vec, 0);
6516cbaf (bonzini        2005-12-16 09:24:19 +0000 3561)              else
6516cbaf (bonzini        2005-12-16 09:24:19 +0000 3562)                {
6516cbaf (bonzini        2005-12-16 09:24:19 +0000 3563)                 
offset -= vec_size;
6516cbaf (bonzini        2005-12-16 09:24:19 +0000 3564)                  vec =
XEXP (vec, 1);
6516cbaf (bonzini        2005-12-16 09:24:19 +0000 3565)                }
6516cbaf (bonzini        2005-12-16 09:24:19 +0000 3566)              vec =
avoid_constant_pool_reference (vec);
6516cbaf (bonzini        2005-12-16 09:24:19 +0000 3567)            }
6516cbaf (bonzini        2005-12-16 09:24:19 +0000 3568) 
6516cbaf (bonzini        2005-12-16 09:24:19 +0000 3569)          if (GET_MODE
(vec) == mode)
6516cbaf (bonzini        2005-12-16 09:24:19 +0000 3570)            return vec;


and aarch64 wasn't there before 4.8...