public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/65237] [5 Regression] r221040 caused many regressions Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:57:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-65237-4-YBw1Nn7Ilo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-65237-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> [-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --] [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8", Size: 3322 bytes --] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237 --- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Martin LiÅ¡ka from comment #3) > (In reply to howarth from comment #2) > > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1) > > > > > > > > On Darwin we also see: > > > gcc.dg/attr-noinline.c (all cases fail) > > > > Didin't Martin analyze this failure as the test case just needing "/* { > > dg-require-alias "" } */"? > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150#c13 > > Yes, I think the test should be decoared with dg-require-alias. hmm.. so should we understand that we used to pass that test .. "incorrectly?" .. .. it's not clear to me that changing the test to require symbol alias isn't still a regression ⦠(I'd like to understand that the code-gen is equivalent). >From gcc-bugs-return-478757-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Feb 27 15:31:54 2015 Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-478757-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org> Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 69894 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2015 15:31:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org> List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org> Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 69853 invoked by uid 48); 27 Feb 2015 15:31:50 -0000 From: "aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/65235] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Simplifying vec_select of vec_concat miscompiles when first element of vec_concat is const_int Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:58:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: <bug-65235-4-Fa8MNoCHzs@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-65235-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-65235-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg03089.txt.bz2 Content-length: 603 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?ide235 Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Hi. The known to work field is empty. Is this a regression? I can't reproduce on a cross build to --targetªrch64-linux by running cc1. What options causes this to fail? Could you post a preprocessed file for the test?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-27 15:29 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2015-02-27 14:15 [Bug ipa/65237] New: " hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2015-02-27 14:34 ` [Bug ipa/65237] " iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-27 15:41 ` howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu 2015-02-27 15:43 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-27 15:55 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2015-02-27 15:57 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2015-02-27 16:57 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-27 17:37 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2015-02-27 17:40 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2015-02-27 18:45 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-27 22:25 ` pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-28 21:36 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-28 21:40 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2015-03-02 8:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-02 17:21 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-02 17:28 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2015-03-02 17:49 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-65237-4-YBw1Nn7Ilo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).