From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27776 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2015 21:24:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27742 invoked by uid 48); 2 Mar 2015 21:24:49 -0000 From: "law at redhat dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/65256] [5 regression] Undefined symbols linking f951 Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 21:24:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: law at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg00202.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65256 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Damn, while I was away, the one thing that came to mind was to ask you for the preprocessed source so that the issue could be analyzed with a cross compiler. If indeed this is fixed by 65150, then I'll count us as lucky. Obviously if it isn't fixed by the patch for 65150, please attach the preprocessed source for further investigation.