public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/65270] [5 regression] ICF needs to match TYPE attributes on memory accesses
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 14:57:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-65270-4-xNsJaqZCVs@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-65270-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270

--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65270
> 
> --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Thanks 
> for looking into this! I think this was just the most obvoious of TYPE 
> flags. Some more we need to look into:
> 
> Is the alias class compare enough to handle TYPE_RESTRICT?

No.  But you can't compare restrict qualification by looking at a memory
reference pair from function A and function B.  You'd have to compare
all data dependences somehow.

You could get some cases by comparing function parameter types specially
(but global vars also have an issue, as well as decl-by-reference
aggregate parameters).

> We probably want to match TYPE_ADDR_SPACE of accesses as that affect codegen?

Well, that should be handled already by comparing MEM_REF operands
via types_compatible_p.

> We apparently need to match TYPE_ATTRIBUTES on functions, because we 
> check that flags on calees so we can not freely redirect them. Will fix 
> that.
>
> Also I think TYPE_STRING_FLAG may affect expand_builtin_classify_type that
> probably ought to be done at folding time during early opts?

classify-type is folded by frontends I think

> TYPE_NEEDS_CONSTRUCTING is used by ipa-pure-const but I think the use is 
> wrong (i.e. if decl needs to be constructed we will drop the readonly 
> flag)

Also sounds frontendish or gimplifyish

> TYPE_NONALIASED_COMPONENT seems to affect alias.c in some way.

Yes.  Similar to DECL_NONADDRESSABLE.  Both are used only by Ada.

> TYPE_FINAL_P also can not be mixed in virtual tables.

It seems to me that ICF isn't quite ready for prime time.  Let's disable
it by default for now, ok?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-03 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-02  0:49 [Bug ipa/65270] New: " hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-02  8:58 ` [Bug ipa/65270] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-02 11:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-02 14:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-02 14:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-02 18:25 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-03 14:57 ` rguenther at suse dot de [this message]
2015-03-03 15:08 ` howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu
2015-03-03 17:24 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2015-03-03 18:23 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-03 20:38 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-04  9:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-04  9:45 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2015-03-04 10:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-04 11:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-04 11:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-04 18:21 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-05  0:11 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-05  0:21 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-05  0:42 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-05  8:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-05  9:40 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2015-03-05  9:42 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2015-03-05  9:45 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2015-03-05 11:30 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-05 19:47 ` [Bug ipa/65270] issues with merging memory accesses from different code paths hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-05 19:59 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-05 20:11 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-05 21:18 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-06  8:32 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2015-03-06 15:41 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-06 18:03 ` [Bug ipa/65270] [5 regression] " hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-09 11:11 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-09 13:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-09 13:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-12 13:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-65270-4-xNsJaqZCVs@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).