From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-479257-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 100478 invoked by alias); 3 Mar 2015 22:23:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 100417 invoked by uid 48); 3 Mar 2015 22:23:30 -0000
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/65305] [5 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/chkp-strchr.c and FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr63995-2.c
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 22:23:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-65305-4-YinceQRdDB@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65305-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65305-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg00401.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65305

Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It looks like we can now have cgraph_edge with null call_stmt so:

Index: tree-sra.c
===================================================================
--- tree-sra.c  (revision 221159)
+++ tree-sra.c  (working copy)
@@ -5036,6 +5036,8 @@ ipa_sra_check_caller (struct cgraph_node
   for (cgraph_edge *cs = node->callers; cs; cs = cs->next_caller)
     {
       gimple call_stmt = cs->call_stmt;
+      if (!call_stmt)
+       continue;
       unsigned count = gimple_call_num_args (call_stmt);
       for (unsigned i = 0; i < count; i++)
        {

is very likely the way to go.