From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-479662-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 112537 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2015 19:28:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 112476 invoked by uid 48); 7 Mar 2015 19:28:28 -0000
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/65341] [5 Regression] glibc build failure on ppc64le: setcontext.S:367: Error: junk at end of line: `1,0'
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2015 19:28:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-65341-4-foLOk1mGoW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65341-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65341-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg00806.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65341

--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Ah, yes, I missed that the macro was defined by gcc rather than glibc.  It does
look like gcc defines the macro and then invokes as without telling it it's in
power6 mode.