From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 82794 invoked by alias); 9 Mar 2015 08:33:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 82730 invoked by uid 48); 9 Mar 2015 08:33:02 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/65357] aggressive loop optimization not correct Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 08:33:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg00900.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D65357 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Perhaps by enabling warnings? E.g. with -Wall you get all the important warnings: warning: operation on =E2=80=98list=E2=80=99 may be undefined [-Wsequence-p= oint] (twice) and warning: return type of =E2=80=98main=E2=80=99 is not =E2=80=98int=E2=80=99= [-Wmain] >>From gcc-bugs-return-479757-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Mar 09 08:36:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 90920 invoked by alias); 9 Mar 2015 08:36:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 90861 invoked by uid 48); 9 Mar 2015 08:36:52 -0000 From: "mikpelinux at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/65358] wrong parameter passing code with tail call optimization on arm Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 08:36:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical X-Bugzilla-Who: mikpelinux at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg00901.txt.bz2 Content-length: 305 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65358 --- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson --- (In reply to Honggyu Kim from comment #4) > Can I add this testcase with your modification as my first gcc contribution? > :) Sure, just attach it to this PR as a new test case.