public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/65358] wrong parameter passing code with tail call optimization on arm
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 11:52:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-65358-4-cLArTXqacG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-65358-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65358
--- Comment #23 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #22)
> (In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #21)
> > As this has been failing since GCC 4.6.3, it is not a regression and
> > therefore Kyrill's fix would not be appropriate for Stage 4.
> >
> > It may be that the release managers make an exception for this fix, given
> > that it can cause wrong-code generation on a primary target. Otherwise, I'd
> > expect this to get fixed in 6.0 and backported as appropriate. Richard/Jakub?
>
> Yeah, I agree it's not a regression on the release branches, but we did have
> wrong-code fixes in stage4 before (like for PR 65235).
> My fix should only ever trigger in the case where we would definitely
> miscompile otherwise, and should not impact codegen in any other case.
>
> I don't mind waiting till stage 1 and backporting later. Up to the
> maintainers/release managers.
It's fine to fix wrong-code regressions in stage4 if they are obviously safe.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-02 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-09 5:56 [Bug target/65358] New: parameter passing bug " hong.gyu.kim at lge dot com
2015-03-09 6:05 ` [Bug target/65358] " hong.gyu.kim at lge dot com
2015-03-09 6:23 ` [Bug target/65358] wrong parameter passing code " hong.gyu.kim at lge dot com
2015-03-09 8:10 ` mikpelinux at gmail dot com
2015-03-09 8:21 ` hong.gyu.kim at lge dot com
2015-03-09 8:29 ` hong.gyu.kim at lge dot com
2015-03-10 13:55 ` jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-13 2:11 ` hong.gyu.kim at lge dot com
2015-03-13 2:14 ` hong.gyu.kim at lge dot com
2015-03-16 11:59 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-16 13:55 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-17 0:04 ` hong.gyu.kim at lge dot com
2015-03-17 0:19 ` hong.gyu.kim at lge dot com
2015-03-17 11:01 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-19 9:17 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-19 10:38 ` hong.gyu.kim at lge dot com
2015-03-19 10:44 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-19 15:19 ` [Bug middle-end/65358] " ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-02 10:08 ` hong.gyu.kim at lge dot com
2015-04-02 10:20 ` jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-02 10:38 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-02 11:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2015-05-27 13:25 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-27 13:33 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-28 1:49 ` hong.gyu.kim at lge dot com
2015-06-24 21:27 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-15 16:11 ` mikpelinux at gmail dot com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-65358-4-cLArTXqacG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).