From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-480193-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 41835 invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2015 15:54:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 41763 invoked by uid 48); 12 Mar 2015 15:54:11 -0000
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/65369] [5 Regression] nettle test failure on powerpc64le-linux-gnu when built with -O3
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 15:54:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-65369-4-X2BfRNs8ay@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65369-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65369-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg01337.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65369

--- Comment #24 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 35020
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35020&action=edit
Unreduced translation unit of the test program.

Compil and run like so:

$ gcc -O3 -Wall -Werror  gcc-65369.i && valgrind ./a.out
==86961== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==86961== Copyright (C) 2002-2013, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==86961== Using Valgrind-3.10.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==86961== Command: ./a.out
==86961== 
buffer[] = { \xe3 \x3b \x4d \xdc \x9c \x38 \xf2 \x19 \x9c \x3e \x7b \x16 \x4f
\xcc \x05 \x36 }
digest[] = { \xe3 \x3b \x4d \xdc \x9c \x38 \xf2 \x19 \x9c \x3e \x7b \x16 \x4f
\xcc \x05 \x36 }
buffer[] = { \xdd \x41 \x11 \xdd \x66 \x91 \x3a \xe2 \xf3 \x9a \xdf \xbc \x43
\x82 \x14 \xd6 }
digest[] = { \xe3 \x3b \x4d \xdc \x9c \x38 \xf2 \x19 \x9c \x3e \x7b \x16 \x4f
\xcc \x05 \x36 }
a.out: gcc-65369.c:41: main: Assertion `0 == memcmp (buffer, digest, sizeof
buffer - 1)' failed.
==86961== 
==86961== HEAP SUMMARY:
==86961==     in use at exit: 97 bytes in 1 blocks
==86961==   total heap usage: 3 allocs, 2 frees, 295 bytes allocated
==86961== 
==86961== LEAK SUMMARY:
==86961==    definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==86961==    indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==86961==      possibly lost: 97 bytes in 1 blocks
==86961==    still reachable: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==86961==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==86961== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory
==86961== 
==86961== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==86961== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
Aborted