From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-482408-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23360 invoked by alias); 31 Mar 2015 16:04:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23290 invoked by uid 48); 31 Mar 2015 16:03:57 -0000
From: "kariya_mitsuru at hotmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/65398] [5 Regression] [C++11] GCC rejects constexpr variable definitions with valid initialization
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:19:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kariya_mitsuru at hotmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-65398-4-l9C4APIJp6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65398-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65398-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg03552.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65398

--- Comment #13 from Mitsuru Kariya <kariya_mitsuru at hotmail dot com> ---
Thank you for your quick response.
But unfortunately, I found problems like below.

========================== sample code 1 ==========================
constexpr char f(const char* s)
{
        return *(s + 1);
}

constexpr char s[] = "ss";

constexpr auto c = f(&s[0]);

int main() {}
========================== sample code 1 ==========================
========================= error message 1 =========================
sample1.cpp:8:21:   in constexpr expansion of 'f((& s[0]))'
sample1.cpp:8:27: error: '*(s + 1u)' is not a constant expression
 constexpr auto c = f(&s[0]);
                           ^
========================= error message 1 =========================

========================== sample code 2 ==========================
constexpr char s1[] = "s1";
constexpr char s2[] = "s2";

constexpr auto eq = (s1 + 0) == (s2 + 1);

int main() {}
========================== sample code 2 ==========================
========================= error message 2 =========================
sample2.cpp:4:30: error: '(((const char*)(& s1)) == (((const char*)(& s2)) +
1u))' is not a constant expression
 constexpr auto eq = (s1 + 0) == (s2 + 1);
                              ^
========================= error message 2 =========================

========================== sample code 3 ==========================
constexpr bool g(char const* found, char const* last) {
        return found == last;
}

constexpr bool f(const char* s)
{
        return g(s, s + 1);
}

constexpr char s[] = "ss";

constexpr auto b = f(&s[0]);

int main() {}
========================== sample code 3 ==========================
========================= error message 3 =========================
sample3.cpp:2:15: error: '((& s[0]) == ((& s[0]) + 1u))' is not a constant
expression
  return found == last;
               ^
========================= error message 3 =========================

The sample code 1 is compiled successfully on both the 4.9.2 and the previous
revision but it causes an error on the head revision.
The sample code 2 causes an error on the 4.9.2, the previous revision and the
head revision.
The sample code 3 is compiled successfully on the 4.9.2, but it causes an error
on both the previous revision and the head revision.

(I use a constexpr library and its tests are passed on 4.9.2 but are failed on
5.0.0.)