From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-480310-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 33755 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2015 17:46:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 33698 invoked by uid 48); 13 Mar 2015 17:46:28 -0000
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/65409] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ICE in store_field
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 17:46:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-65409-4-oaCr9kjH7h@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65409-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65409-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg01454.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65409

--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> I agree for 4.8/4.9 that your version is safer.
> Anyway, you're the RTL maintainer, so I'll let you decide.

OK, testing went fine, so I'll go for this version on all branches.