public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/65478] [5 regression] crafty performance regression
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 09:45:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-65478-4-rETE0pk4m5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-65478-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65478
--- Comment #11 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 35159
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35159&action=edit
Patch implementing cloning penalties
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #8)
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #7)
> > Yep, that sounds like resonable thing to try to me.
> >
>
> OK, I'll prepare a patch for this part.
This is the patch, it has survived bootstrap and regtest on
x86_64-linux. I have not measured crafty run-time with it yet.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-27 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-19 22:38 [Bug tree-optimization/65478] New: " hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-19 22:45 ` [Bug tree-optimization/65478] " hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-20 2:51 ` [Bug ipa/65478] [5 regression] " hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-20 10:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-20 18:25 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2015-03-20 19:19 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2015-03-24 14:10 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-24 17:23 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2015-03-24 18:48 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-25 7:57 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2015-03-27 9:45 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2015-03-27 9:49 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-29 14:15 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-29 17:46 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-30 2:23 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-30 11:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-30 17:53 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2015-03-30 20:02 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-30 21:40 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-31 12:14 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2015-03-31 13:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-01 14:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-01 17:51 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2015-04-02 8:38 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2015-04-05 23:55 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-07 8:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-65478-4-rETE0pk4m5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).