From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 108972 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2015 15:20:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 108932 invoked by uid 48); 22 Mar 2015 15:20:09 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/65512] Inconsistent report of uninitialized members Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 16:52:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg02269.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65512 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Peter VARGA from comment #3) > 1) I had no idea how the importance is qualified. Is my 1st bug report. For > me it was a blocker because I could not finish compiling That applies to most bugs if you think about it. And every bug reporter thinks their bug is important ... to them. > 2) Not using -Werror is really a bit hard - don't you think?! Umm, no.