public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug lto/65536] LTO line number information garbled Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 08:36:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-65536-4-abVkjhTI5P@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-65536-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65536 --- Comment #48 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I run memory statistics with the cache and my patch. I will run stats with cache w/o the libcpp patch tomorrow. I would like to get this problem solved, but perhaps we want to only track down the reason for wrong line numbers and do more tuning next stage1 & backport. I suppose I can implement checking that will lookup location after every insert to double check lines are not garbled. Dropped columns are I guess acceptable (it would be nice to drop the wrong carrets then) So for memory use: realloc_for_line_map is now at 16810000: 0.9% of GGC memory use pre-IPA. This is definitly improvement. Gimple streaming however push it up to 75497496:4.2% I guess this suggest that caching blocks and gimple stmt locators would make a lot of difference. ltrans report 4194328: 5.4% post main decl streaming, but before bodies are read in.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-27 7:26 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2015-03-24 7:42 [Bug lto/65536] New: [5 regression] " hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-24 10:15 ` [Bug lto/65536] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-24 10:15 ` [Bug lto/65536] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-24 12:52 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-24 13:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-24 14:34 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-24 14:42 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-24 14:54 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-24 16:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-24 16:44 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-24 17:23 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2015-03-24 19:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-24 19:41 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-24 19:51 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-24 19:58 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-24 20:22 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-25 3:11 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-25 3:22 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-25 7:21 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2015-03-25 7:24 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2015-03-25 9:18 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-25 9:54 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-25 10:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-25 10:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-25 13:30 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-25 18:13 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2015-03-25 21:40 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-25 22:04 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-25 23:36 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-26 0:08 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-26 0:19 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-26 2:29 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2015-03-26 2:45 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-26 17:49 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-27 7:26 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-27 8:11 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-27 8:36 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2015-03-27 15:47 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-27 15:53 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2015-03-27 16:32 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2015-03-27 16:50 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-27 19:39 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-65536-4-abVkjhTI5P@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).