From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 119867 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2015 12:54:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 119812 invoked by uid 48); 23 Apr 2015 12:54:27 -0000 From: "juergen.reuter at desy dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/65548] [5/6 Regression] gfc_conv_procedure_call Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:54:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: juergen.reuter at desy dot de X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vehre at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.2 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg02002.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D65548 --- Comment #21 from J=C3=BCrgen Reuter --- (In reply to vehre from comment #20) > Juergen, could you meanwhile check, that the patch fixes the issue? Damn, it seems my text didn't get posted. Being in Japan at the moment, and sometimes not having the best connection. NO, it doesn't fix the issue. The= one I posted yes, but there are two other cases where it fails. >>From gcc-bugs-return-484453-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Apr 23 12:58:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 126975 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2015 12:58:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 126009 invoked by uid 48); 23 Apr 2015 12:58:01 -0000 From: "vehre at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/58754] [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on allocating character array with source Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:58:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: vehre at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pault at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg02005.txt.bz2 Content-length: 506 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58754 Bug 58754 depends on bug 57456, which changed state. Bug 57456 Summary: [OOP] CLASS + CHARACTER ALLOCATE with typespec: For arrays, the typespec is ignored https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57456 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED