public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/65554] [5 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 19:03:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-65554-4-QRyjc61CbR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-65554-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65554
Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|5.0 |---
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Why do you think this is a regression (or recent regression)?
> Already r171770 ICEs with it, r171700 does not, but it rejects the testcase
> and probably doesn't really support std::initializer_list.
Well, I haven't tested it with older compilers at all, because
Matthias set 4.9.2 in the "known to work" field.
Will leave the "Target Milestone" field untouched in the future...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-25 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-25 16:18 [Bug middle-end/65554] New: " doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-25 17:55 ` [Bug middle-end/65554] " trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-25 18:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-25 19:03 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2015-03-25 19:28 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-26 11:35 ` [Bug c++/65554] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-31 14:27 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-31 14:34 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-31 14:48 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-31 15:19 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-01 13:08 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-01 13:11 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-01 13:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-01 15:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-08 9:17 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-09 15:48 ` [Bug middle-end/65554] [5 Regression] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-09 18:31 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-09 18:31 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-10 23:28 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-65554-4-QRyjc61CbR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).