From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 64844 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2015 03:23:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 64801 invoked by uid 48); 26 Mar 2015 03:23:43 -0000 From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/65577] New: ICE on g++.dg/torture/pr58369.C Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 08:15:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg02900.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D65577 Bug ID: 65577 Summary: ICE on g++.dg/torture/pr58369.C Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Compiling the g++.dg/torture/pr58369.C test with yesterday's trunk (r221640= ) on powerpc64 (a POWER7 processor) fails with the ICE below. Interestingly, the ICE disappears with -O1. On powerpc64le gcc compiles the test successfully. $ g++ -O0 -c /src/gcc-trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr58369.C /src/gcc-trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr58369.C: In function =E2=80= =98T ellint_rj_imp(T, T, T, T, Policy&) [with T =3D long double; Policy =3D Poli= cyA]=E2=80=99: /src/gcc-trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr58369.C:88:1: error: unrecognizable insn: } ^ (insn 248 247 99 8 (set (reg:DF 10 10) (mem/u/c:DF (symbol_ref/u:DI ("*.LC0") [flags 0x2]) [0 S8 A64])) /src/gcc-trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr58369.C:70 -1 (nil)) /src/gcc-trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr58369.C:88:1: internal compil= er error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2343 0x109c9f1b _fatal_insn(char const*, rtx_def const*, char const*, int, char const*) /src/gcc-trunk/gcc/rtl-error.c:110 0x109c9f6f _fatal_insn_not_found(rtx_def const*, char const*, int, char con= st*) /src/gcc-trunk/gcc/rtl-error.c:118 0x1098f907 extract_insn(rtx_insn*) /src/gcc-trunk/gcc/recog.c:2343 0x1098f9c7 extract_insn_cached(rtx_insn*) /src/gcc-trunk/gcc/recog.c:2234 0x106b6817 cleanup_subreg_operands(rtx_insn*) /src/gcc-trunk/gcc/final.c:3137 0x109c74b7 reload(rtx_insn*, int) /src/gcc-trunk/gcc/reload1.c:1278 0x10854af7 do_reload /src/gcc-trunk/gcc/ira.c:5430 0x10854af7 execute /src/gcc-trunk/gcc/ira.c:5589 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report. See for instructions. >>From gcc-bugs-return-481757-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Mar 26 03:39:44 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 88088 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2015 03:39:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 88040 invoked by uid 48); 26 Mar 2015 03:39:40 -0000 From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libfortran/65563] Segfault on reopening fort.xxx file with explicit name Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 08:21:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg02901.txt.bz2 Content-length: 522 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65563 --- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #0) > This is inspired by > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29238857/fortran-error-about-eof-marker/ > ,but is slightly different. > > This segfaults: I cannot reproduce this on trunk (5.0) and I get nothing with -fsanitize=address accept the error message. This is on x86-64-linux. So I am at a "works for me" stage here. I will look some more later.