From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 124069 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2015 10:59:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 124034 invoked by uid 48); 27 Mar 2015 10:59:00 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/65598] Misleading error message for out-of-class definition of explicit conversion operator Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 11:17:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: trivial X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords bug_status resolution target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg03126.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D65598 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |5.0 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- GCC 5 says: e.cc:6:42: error: =E2=80=98explicit=E2=80=99 outside class declaration explicit ExplicitTest::operator bool() const ^ (The caret position is a well known issue with all error locations, there is work being done to improve things.) >>From gcc-bugs-return-481983-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Mar 27 11:00:40 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 126061 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2015 11:00:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 125704 invoked by uid 48); 27 Mar 2015 11:00:32 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/65594] libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-6.c timeout Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 11:22:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg03127.txt.bz2 Content-length: 262 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65594 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- And use M instead of N in the outer two loops and define M to something lower (100, 50 or similar)? The test doesn't verify the result anyway.