public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "adconrad at 0c3 dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/65670] [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabi Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 04:03:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-65670-4-P6jDKp06Qh@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-65670-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65670 Adam Conrad <adconrad at 0c3 dot net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adconrad at 0c3 dot net --- Comment #9 from Adam Conrad <adconrad at 0c3 dot net> --- Testing in an Ubuntu 15.04 chroot with the latest distro 4.9 and the latest 5.0 from Matthias's PPA, I see this: (vivid-ppc64el)adconrad@kelsey01:~$ objdump -T /usr/lib/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.20 | grep 17bad_function_call 000000000014f268 w DO .data.rel.ro 0000000000000028 GLIBCXX_3.4.15 _ZTVSt17bad_function_call 00000000000f7ff0 g DF .text 0000000000000050 GLIBCXX_3.4.15 0x60 _ZNSt17bad_function_callD0Ev 00000000000f7f80 g DF .text 0000000000000020 GLIBCXX_3.4.18 0x60 _ZNKSt17bad_function_call4whatEv 00000000000f7fa0 g DF .text 0000000000000044 GLIBCXX_3.4.15 0x60 _ZNSt17bad_function_callD1Ev 000000000014f250 w DO .data.rel.ro 0000000000000018 GLIBCXX_3.4.15 _ZTISt17bad_function_call 00000000000f7fa0 g DF .text 0000000000000044 GLIBCXX_3.4.15 0x60 _ZNSt17bad_function_callD2Ev (vivid-ppc64el)adconrad@kelsey01:~$ objdump -T whee/usr/lib/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.21 | grep 17bad_function_call 00000000000e1e70 g DF .text 0000000000000050 GLIBCXX_3.4.15 0x60 _ZNSt17bad_function_callD0Ev 00000000000e1e20 g DF .text 0000000000000044 GLIBCXX_3.4.15 0x60 _ZNSt17bad_function_callD2Ev 00000000000e1e00 g DF .text 0000000000000020 GLIBCXX_3.4.18 0x60 _ZNKSt17bad_function_call4whatEv 00000000001ea988 w DO .data.rel.ro 0000000000000028 GLIBCXX_3.4.15 _ZTVSt17bad_function_call 00000000001ea970 w DO .data.rel.ro 0000000000000018 GLIBCXX_3.4.15 _ZTISt17bad_function_call 00000000000e1e20 g DF .text 0000000000000044 GLIBCXX_3.4.15 0x60 _ZNSt17bad_function_callD1Ev In other words, it all looks fine to me, so I'm not entirely sure where he's seeing the regression.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-07 4:03 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2015-04-03 22:17 [Bug target/65670] New: [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu doko at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-04-06 8:54 ` [Bug target/65670] [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabi mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-04-06 9:10 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-04-06 9:43 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org 2015-04-06 9:48 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-04-06 9:51 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-04-06 22:21 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-04-07 4:03 ` adconrad at 0c3 dot net [this message] 2015-04-07 8:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-04-07 13:56 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-04-09 7:53 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-04-09 15:31 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-04-09 15:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-04-09 16:08 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-04-10 13:43 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-04-14 19:07 ` [Bug target/65670] " doko at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-65670-4-P6jDKp06Qh@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).