[Bug target/65670] New: [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* [Bug target/65670] New: [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu
@ 2015-04-03 22:17 doko at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-06  8:54 ` [Bug target/65670] [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabi mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (14 more replies)
  0 siblings, 15 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: doko at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-03 22:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65670

            Bug ID: 65670
           Summary: [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on
                    powerpc64le-linux-gnu
           Product: gcc
           Version: 5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: doko at gcc dot gnu.org

not sure if this is a local configuration error, but I end up with a libstdc++
without these symbols (which exist in a lib built from the 4.9 branch):

 _ZNSt17bad_function_callD0Ev@GLIBCXX_3.4.15 4.6
 _ZNSt17bad_function_callD1Ev@GLIBCXX_3.4.15 4.6
 _ZNSt17bad_function_callD2Ev@GLIBCXX_3.4.15 4.6
 _ZTVSt17bad_function_call@GLIBCXX_3.4.15 4.6

in any case, there should be a baseline_symbols.txt for powerpc64le-linux-gnu,
which currently doesn't exist.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/65670] [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabi
  2015-04-03 22:17 [Bug target/65670] New: [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu doko at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-06  8:54 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-06  9:10 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-06  8:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65670

Maxim Kuvyrkov <mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Maxim Kuvyrkov <mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Demangled, these are:

std::bad_function_call::~bad_function_call()
std::bad_function_call::~bad_function_call()
std::bad_function_call::~bad_function_call()
vtable for std::bad_function_call


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/65670] [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabi
  2015-04-03 22:17 [Bug target/65670] New: [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu doko at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-06  8:54 ` [Bug target/65670] [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabi mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-06  9:10 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-06  9:43 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: doko at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-06  9:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65670

--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose <doko at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
at least on powerpc64le this looks like a versioning issue. in 4.9 these were
versioned @CXXABI_1.3.5, now in 5, they are versioned @GLIBCXX_3.4.15.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/65670] [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabi
  2015-04-03 22:17 [Bug target/65670] New: [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu doko at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-06  8:54 ` [Bug target/65670] [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabi mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-06  9:10 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-06  9:43 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
  2015-04-06  9:48 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2015-04-06  9:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65670

--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> ---
Worksforme.

$ objdump -T usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.21 | grep bad_function_callD
00000000000e7a90 g    DF .text  0000000000000050  GLIBCXX_3.4.15 0x60
_ZNSt17bad_function_callD0Ev
00000000000e7a40 g    DF .text  0000000000000044  GLIBCXX_3.4.15 0x60
_ZNSt17bad_function_callD2Ev
00000000000e7a40 g    DF .text  0000000000000044  GLIBCXX_3.4.15 0x60
_ZNSt17bad_function_callD1Ev
$ objdump -T usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.20 | grep 17bad_function_callD
00000000000fce10 g    DF .text  0000000000000050  GLIBCXX_3.4.15 0x60
_ZNSt17bad_function_callD0Ev
00000000000fcdc0 g    DF .text  0000000000000044  GLIBCXX_3.4.15 0x60
_ZNSt17bad_function_callD1Ev
00000000000fcdc0 g    DF .text  0000000000000044  GLIBCXX_3.4.15 0x60
_ZNSt17bad_function_callD2Ev


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/65670] [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabi
  2015-04-03 22:17 [Bug target/65670] New: [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu doko at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-04-06  9:43 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2015-04-06  9:48 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-06  9:51 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-06  9:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65670

--- Comment #5 from Maxim Kuvyrkov <mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Mattias, Andreas,

What binutils versions are you using?  I'm starting to think this can be a
linker optimization or linker bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/65670] [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabi
  2015-04-03 22:17 [Bug target/65670] New: [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu doko at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-04-06  9:48 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-06  9:51 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-06 22:21 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: doko at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-06  9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65670

--- Comment #6 from Matthias Klose <doko at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
both seen with 2.25 release, and powerpc64le with 2.25 branch.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/65670] [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabi
  2015-04-03 22:17 [Bug target/65670] New: [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu doko at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-04-06  9:51 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-06 22:21 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-07  4:03 ` adconrad at 0c3 dot net
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-06 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65670

--- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I do plan to add the baseline_symbols.txt file for powerpc64le-linux-gnu in a
patch shortly.  I thought this had been done, but it seems to have fallen
through the cracks.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/65670] [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabi
  2015-04-03 22:17 [Bug target/65670] New: [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu doko at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-04-06 22:21 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-07  4:03 ` adconrad at 0c3 dot net
  2015-04-07  8:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: adconrad at 0c3 dot net @ 2015-04-07  4:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65670

Adam Conrad <adconrad at 0c3 dot net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |adconrad at 0c3 dot net

--- Comment #9 from Adam Conrad <adconrad at 0c3 dot net> ---
Testing in an Ubuntu 15.04 chroot with the latest distro 4.9 and the latest 5.0
from Matthias's PPA, I see this:

(vivid-ppc64el)adconrad@kelsey01:~$ objdump -T
/usr/lib/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.20 | grep 17bad_function_call
000000000014f268  w   DO .data.rel.ro   0000000000000028  GLIBCXX_3.4.15
_ZTVSt17bad_function_call
00000000000f7ff0 g    DF .text  0000000000000050  GLIBCXX_3.4.15 0x60
_ZNSt17bad_function_callD0Ev
00000000000f7f80 g    DF .text  0000000000000020  GLIBCXX_3.4.18 0x60
_ZNKSt17bad_function_call4whatEv
00000000000f7fa0 g    DF .text  0000000000000044  GLIBCXX_3.4.15 0x60
_ZNSt17bad_function_callD1Ev
000000000014f250  w   DO .data.rel.ro   0000000000000018  GLIBCXX_3.4.15
_ZTISt17bad_function_call
00000000000f7fa0 g    DF .text  0000000000000044  GLIBCXX_3.4.15 0x60
_ZNSt17bad_function_callD2Ev
(vivid-ppc64el)adconrad@kelsey01:~$ objdump -T
whee/usr/lib/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.21 | grep
17bad_function_call
00000000000e1e70 g    DF .text  0000000000000050  GLIBCXX_3.4.15 0x60
_ZNSt17bad_function_callD0Ev
00000000000e1e20 g    DF .text  0000000000000044  GLIBCXX_3.4.15 0x60
_ZNSt17bad_function_callD2Ev
00000000000e1e00 g    DF .text  0000000000000020  GLIBCXX_3.4.18 0x60
_ZNKSt17bad_function_call4whatEv
00000000001ea988  w   DO .data.rel.ro   0000000000000028  GLIBCXX_3.4.15
_ZTVSt17bad_function_call
00000000001ea970  w   DO .data.rel.ro   0000000000000018  GLIBCXX_3.4.15
_ZTISt17bad_function_call
00000000000e1e20 g    DF .text  0000000000000044  GLIBCXX_3.4.15 0x60
_ZNSt17bad_function_callD1Ev

In other words, it all looks fine to me, so I'm not entirely sure where he's
seeing the regression.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/65670] [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabi
  2015-04-03 22:17 [Bug target/65670] New: [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu doko at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-04-07  4:03 ` adconrad at 0c3 dot net
@ 2015-04-07  8:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-07 13:56 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-07  8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65670

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2015-04-07
   Target Milestone|---                         |5.0
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/65670] [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabi
  2015-04-03 22:17 [Bug target/65670] New: [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu doko at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-04-07  8:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-07 13:56 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-09  7:53 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-07 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65670

--- Comment #10 from Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Per discussion on gcc-patches, powerpc64le-linux-gnu shares the
baseline_symbols.txt file with powerpc64-linux-gnu, and there's no current
reason for them to diverge.  So nothing to do on that front.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/65670] [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabi
  2015-04-03 22:17 [Bug target/65670] New: [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu doko at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-04-07 13:56 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-09  7:53 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-09 15:31 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-09  7:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65670

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
And baseline_symbols.txt has been updated for powerpc64-linux (if somebody from
IBM could update powerpc-linux (32-bit), it would be greatly appreciated, I
don't have an rpm build for that right now, as Fedora is 64-bit only on ppc*
these days).


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/65670] [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabi
  2015-04-03 22:17 [Bug target/65670] New: [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu doko at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-04-09  7:53 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-09 15:31 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-09 15:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-09 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65670

--- Comment #12 from Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I've generated the new version for powerpc-linux-gnu.  I believe this needs to
be updated identically in powerpc-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt and in
powerpc64-linux-gnu/32/baseline_symbols.txt.  Is that correct?

Before committing this, I'll post the differences from the old files on
gcc-patches.  I think you said I need to delete a couple of the TLS symbols, so
I want to verify that.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/65670] [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabi
  2015-04-03 22:17 [Bug target/65670] New: [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu doko at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-04-09 15:31 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-09 15:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-09 16:08 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-09 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65670

--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #12)
> I've generated the new version for powerpc-linux-gnu.  I believe this needs
> to be updated identically in powerpc-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt and in
> powerpc64-linux-gnu/32/baseline_symbols.txt.  Is that correct?

Yeah.

> Before committing this, I'll post the differences from the old files on
> gcc-patches.  I think you said I need to delete a couple of the TLS symbols,
> so I want to verify that.

Yes.  Please also verify the patch will only add symbols to new symbol versions
(GLIBCXX_3.4.21, CXXABI_1.3.9, GLIBCXX_LDBL_3.4.21 I think are the relevant to
PPC).


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/65670] [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabi
  2015-04-03 22:17 [Bug target/65670] New: [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu doko at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-04-09 15:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-09 16:08 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-10 13:43 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-14 19:07 ` [Bug target/65670] " doko at gcc dot gnu.org
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-09 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65670

--- Comment #14 from Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
OK.  Yes, only new symbols except for those two rogue TLS symbols that I'll
remove.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/65670] [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabi
  2015-04-03 22:17 [Bug target/65670] New: [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu doko at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-04-09 16:08 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-10 13:43 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-14 19:07 ` [Bug target/65670] " doko at gcc dot gnu.org
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-10 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65670

--- Comment #15 from Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
powerpc version committed as r221974.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/65670] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabi
  2015-04-03 22:17 [Bug target/65670] New: [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu doko at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-04-10 13:43 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-14 19:07 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: doko at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-14 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65670

Matthias Klose <doko at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID
            Summary|[5/6 Regression] missing    |missing libstdc++ symbols
                   |libstdc++ symbols on        |on powerpc64le-linux-gnu
                   |powerpc64le-linux-gnu and   |and arm-linux-gnueabi
                   |arm-linux-gnueabi           |

--- Comment #16 from Matthias Klose <doko at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
rechecked, and I really see the same symbols as everybody else. sorry for the
noise.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-04-14 19:07 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-04-03 22:17 [Bug target/65670] New: [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-06  8:54 ` [Bug target/65670] [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabi mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-06  9:10 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-06  9:43 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2015-04-06  9:48 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-06  9:51 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-06 22:21 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-07  4:03 ` adconrad at 0c3 dot net
2015-04-07  8:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-07 13:56 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-09  7:53 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-09 15:31 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-09 15:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-09 16:08 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-10 13:43 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-14 19:07 ` [Bug target/65670] " doko at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).