* [Bug middle-end/65702] [5 Regression] ICE (tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in expand_gimple_basic_block, at cfgexpand.c:5506) on arm-linux-gnueabihf
[not found] <bug-65702-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2015-04-08 18:21 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-08 18:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: doko at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-08 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65702
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose <doko at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
seen building the aseprite package on armhf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/65702] [5 Regression] ICE (tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in expand_gimple_basic_block, at cfgexpand.c:5506) on arm-linux-gnueabihf
[not found] <bug-65702-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2015-04-08 18:21 ` [Bug middle-end/65702] [5 Regression] ICE (tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in expand_gimple_basic_block, at cfgexpand.c:5506) on arm-linux-gnueabihf doko at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-08 18:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-08 19:27 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-08 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65702
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |error-recovery,
| |ice-on-invalid-code
Target|arm-linux-gnueabihf |
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
More reduced:
int a[1], b;
int
foo ()
{
register int c asm ("");
while (b)
if (a[5])
c = b;
return c;
}
ICEs even on x86_64-linux.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/65702] [5 Regression] ICE (tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in expand_gimple_basic_block, at cfgexpand.c:5506) on arm-linux-gnueabihf
[not found] <bug-65702-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2015-04-08 18:21 ` [Bug middle-end/65702] [5 Regression] ICE (tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in expand_gimple_basic_block, at cfgexpand.c:5506) on arm-linux-gnueabihf doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-08 18:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-08 19:27 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-09 8:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-08 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65702
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-04-08
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Started with r214526.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/65702] [5 Regression] ICE (tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in expand_gimple_basic_block, at cfgexpand.c:5506) on arm-linux-gnueabihf
[not found] <bug-65702-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-08 19:27 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-09 8:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-09 8:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-09 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65702
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Can't we diagnose this earlier during parsing and avoid making it
DECL_HARD_REGISTER in the first place?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/65702] [5 Regression] ICE (tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in expand_gimple_basic_block, at cfgexpand.c:5506) on arm-linux-gnueabihf
[not found] <bug-65702-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-09 8:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-09 8:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-09 9:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-09 8:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65702
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think that would be desirable. But probably not through trying to call
make_decl_rtl on those, we really should avoid creating RTL too early.
So, perhaps the checks need to be moved to a helper routine that can be called
from both make_decl_rtl and the FEs?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/65702] [5 Regression] ICE (tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in expand_gimple_basic_block, at cfgexpand.c:5506) on arm-linux-gnueabihf
[not found] <bug-65702-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-09 8:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-09 9:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-22 12:00 ` [Bug middle-end/65702] [5/6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-16 9:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-09 9:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65702
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/65702] [5/6 Regression] ICE (tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in expand_gimple_basic_block, at cfgexpand.c:5506) on arm-linux-gnueabihf
[not found] <bug-65702-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-09 9:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-22 12:00 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-16 9:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-22 12:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65702
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|5.0 |5.2
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 5.1 has been released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/65702] [5/6 Regression] ICE (tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in expand_gimple_basic_block, at cfgexpand.c:5506) on arm-linux-gnueabihf
[not found] <bug-65702-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-22 12:00 ` [Bug middle-end/65702] [5/6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-07-16 9:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-07-16 9:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65702
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 5.2 is being released, adjusting target milestone to 5.3.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread