From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-483479-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 15007 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2015 13:46:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14953 invoked by uid 48); 13 Apr 2015 13:46:01 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/65751] Bogus &L in error message
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 13:46:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-65751-4-RKprDImnGR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65751-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65751-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg01031.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65751

Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2015-04-13
                 CC|                            |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
Shouldn't it be rather

@@ -3632,9 +3632,9 @@ gfc_check_pointer_assign (gfc_expr *lval
            || (lvalue->ts.type == BT_DERIVED
            && (lvalue->ts.u.derived->attr.is_bind_c
                || lvalue->ts.u.derived->attr.sequence))))
-    gfc_error ("Data-pointer-object &L must be unlimited "
+    gfc_error ("Data-pointer-object at %L must be unlimited "
            "polymorphic, a sequence derived type or of a "
-           "type with the BIND attribute assignment at %L "
+           "type with the BIND attribute assignment "
            "to be compatible with an unlimited polymorphic "
            "target", &lvalue->where);
       else

?