From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24268 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2015 09:06:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24239 invoked by uid 48); 14 Apr 2015 09:06:16 -0000 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/65752] Too strong optimizations int -> pointer casts Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 09:06:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg01089.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65752 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Other testcase: int main() { int *p; int x = 0; if (p == &x) *p = 1; return x; } we optimize this to return 0. You probably wouldn't consider that invalid I guess?