[Bug lto/65767] New: Test pr65276 failed on arm-none-eabi

public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* [Bug lto/65767] New: Test pr65276 failed on arm-none-eabi
@ 2015-04-15  2:52 amker at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-15  7:50 ` [Bug lto/65767] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (11 more replies)
  0 siblings, 12 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: amker at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-15  2:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65767

            Bug ID: 65767
           Summary: Test pr65276 failed on arm-none-eabi
           Product: gcc
           Version: 5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: lto
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: amker at gcc dot gnu.org

Hi,
The test failed on arm-none-eabi with below error messages
Executing on host: /arm-none-eabi/obj/gcc2/gcc/testsuite/g++8/../../xg++
-B/arm-none-eabi/obj/gcc2/gcc/testsuite/g++8/../../ cp_lto_pr65276_0.o
cp_lto_pr65276_1.o g++_tg.o  -fno-diagnostics-show-caret
-fdiagnostics-color=never  -nostdinc++
-I/arm-none-eabi/obj/gcc2/arm-none-eabi/libstdc++-v3/include/arm-none-eabi
-I/arm-none-eabi/obj/gcc2/arm-none-eabi/libstdc++-v3/include
-I/src/gcc/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ -I/src/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/backward
-I/src/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util -fmessage-length=0 -flto -O0 -std=c++11 
 -specs=rdimon.specs -Wa,-mno-warn-deprecated
-L/arm-none-eabi/obj/gcc2/arm-none-eabi/./libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-B/arm-none-eabi/obj/gcc2/arm-none-eabi/./libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -Wl,-wrap,exit
-Wl,-wrap,_exit -Wl,-wrap,main -Wl,-wrap,abort      -o
g++-dg-lto-pr65276-01.exe    (timeout = 300)
spawn /arm-none-eabi/obj/gcc2/gcc/testsuite/g++8/../../xg++
-B/arm-none-eabi/obj/gcc2/gcc/testsuite/g++8/../../ cp_lto_pr65276_0.o
cp_lto_pr65276_1.o g++_tg.o -fno-diagnostics-show-caret
-fdiagnostics-color=never -nostdinc++
-I/arm-none-eabi/obj/gcc2/arm-none-eabi/libstdc++-v3/include/arm-none-eabi
-I/arm-none-eabi/obj/gcc2/arm-none-eabi/libstdc++-v3/include
-I/src/gcc/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ -I/src/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/backward
-I/src/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util -fmessage-length=0 -flto -O0 -std=c++11
-specs=rdimon.specs -Wa,-mno-warn-deprecated
-L/arm-none-eabi/obj/gcc2/arm-none-eabi/./libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-B/arm-none-eabi/obj/gcc2/arm-none-eabi/./libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -Wl,-wrap,exit
-Wl,-wrap,_exit -Wl,-wrap,main -Wl,-wrap,abort -o g++-dg-lto-pr65276-01.exe
/tmp/61243907.0/ccwrV09Z.ltrans0.ltrans.o:(.rodata+0x0): multiple definition of
`typeinfo for std::exception'
/arm-none-eabi/obj/gcc2/arm-none-eabi/./libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.a(eh_exception.o):(.rodata._ZTISt9exception+0x0):
first defined here
/tmp/61243907.0/ccwrV09Z.ltrans0.ltrans.o:(.rodata+0x8): multiple definition of
`typeinfo name for std::exception'
/arm-none-eabi/obj/gcc2/arm-none-eabi/./libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.a(eh_exception.o):/src/gcc/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/eh_exception.cc:35:
first defined here
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
compiler exited with status 1
output is:
/tmp/61243907.0/ccwrV09Z.ltrans0.ltrans.o:(.rodata+0x0): multiple definition of
`typeinfo for std::exception'
/arm-none-eabi/obj/gcc2/arm-none-eabi/./libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.a(eh_exception.o):(.rodata._ZTISt9exception+0x0):
first defined here
/tmp/61243907.0/ccwrV09Z.ltrans0.ltrans.o:(.rodata+0x8): multiple definition of
`typeinfo name for std::exception'
/arm-none-eabi/obj/gcc2/arm-none-eabi/./libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.a(eh_exception.o):/src/gcc/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/eh_exception.cc:35:
first defined here
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr65276 cp_lto_pr65276_0.o-cp_lto_pr65276_1.o link, -flto -O0
-std=c++11
UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/lto/pr65276 cp_lto_pr65276_0.o-cp_lto_pr65276_1.o execute
-flto -O0 -std=c++11

I saw there is another report of this case against x86 at PR65718, but seems
with different message.

Thanks.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/65767] Test pr65276 failed on arm-none-eabi
  2015-04-15  2:52 [Bug lto/65767] New: Test pr65276 failed on arm-none-eabi amker at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-15  7:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-15  9:51 ` amker at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-15  7:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65767

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Same cause though.  See my comment there, can you prepare and verify a patch?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/65767] Test pr65276 failed on arm-none-eabi
  2015-04-15  2:52 [Bug lto/65767] New: Test pr65276 failed on arm-none-eabi amker at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-15  7:50 ` [Bug lto/65767] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-15  9:51 ` amker at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-21  2:23 ` [Bug testsuite/65767] " amker at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: amker at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-15  9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65767

--- Comment #2 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Same cause though.  See my comment there, can you prepare and verify a patch?

Yeah.  Will do that.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/65767] Test pr65276 failed on arm-none-eabi
  2015-04-15  2:52 [Bug lto/65767] New: Test pr65276 failed on arm-none-eabi amker at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-15  7:50 ` [Bug lto/65767] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-15  9:51 ` amker at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-21  2:23 ` amker at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-22  9:38 ` amker at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: amker at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-21  2:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65767

--- Comment #3 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Tue Apr 21 02:23:18 2015
New Revision: 222255

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222255&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:

    PR testsuite/65767
    * g++.dg/lto/pr65276_0.C: Change namespace std to std2.
    * g++.dg/lto/pr65276_1.C: Change namespace std to std2.


Modified:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr65276_0.C
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr65276_1.C


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/65767] Test pr65276 failed on arm-none-eabi
  2015-04-15  2:52 [Bug lto/65767] New: Test pr65276 failed on arm-none-eabi amker at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-04-21  2:23 ` [Bug testsuite/65767] " amker at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-22  9:38 ` amker at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-22 19:45 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: amker at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-22  9:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65767

--- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Wed Apr 22 09:37:52 2015
New Revision: 222319

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222319&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:

    Backport from trunk r222255
    2015-04-21  Bin Cheng  <bin.cheng@arm.com>

    PR testsuite/65767
    * g++.dg/lto/pr65276_0.C: Change namespace std to std2.
    * g++.dg/lto/pr65276_1.C: Change namespace std to std2.


Modified:
    branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr65276_0.C
    branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr65276_1.C


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/65767] Test pr65276 failed on arm-none-eabi
  2015-04-15  2:52 [Bug lto/65767] New: Test pr65276 failed on arm-none-eabi amker at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-04-22  9:38 ` amker at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-22 19:45 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-05-04 12:55 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-22 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65767

Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |5.0

--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to amker from comment #4)
> Author: amker
> Date: Wed Apr 22 09:37:52 2015
> New Revision: 222319
> 
> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222319&root=gcc&view=rev
> Log:
> 
> 	Backport from trunk r222255
> 	2015-04-21  Bin Cheng  <bin.cheng@arm.com>
> 
> 	PR testsuite/65767
> 	* g++.dg/lto/pr65276_0.C: Change namespace std to std2.
> 	* g++.dg/lto/pr65276_1.C: Change namespace std to std2.
> 
> 
> Modified:
>     branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>     branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr65276_0.C
>     branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr65276_1.C

Fixed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-484381-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Apr 22 19:46:16 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-484381-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 81208 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2015 19:46:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 81131 invoked by uid 48); 22 Apr 2015 19:46:09 -0000
From: "ramana at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/65711] arm*-linux* "link" spec passes '-dynamic-linker' even for '-shared'
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 19:46:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-65711-4-q9Ua3gQ1KY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65711-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65711-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg01933.txt.bz2
Content-length: 545

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65711

Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ramana at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Ludovic Courtès from comment #1)
> Created attachment 35270 [details]
> Proposed patch

Patches on gcc-patches please as per policy.
>From gcc-bugs-return-484382-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Apr 22 19:49:47 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-484382-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 86923 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2015 19:49:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 86865 invoked by uid 48); 22 Apr 2015 19:49:44 -0000
From: "ramana at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/65326] LRA missing a Thumb optimization.
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 19:49:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc cf_known_to_work everconfirmed cf_known_to_fail
Message-ID: <bug-65326-4-Ogkf5KoVcI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65326-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65326-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg01934.txt.bz2
Content-length: 834

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?ide326

Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |missed-optimization
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2015-04-22
                 CC|                            |ramana at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |yvan.roux at linaro dot org
      Known to work|                            |4.8.0, 4.8.1, 4.8.2, 4.9.0,
                   |                            |4.9.1, 4.9.2, 4.9.3
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
      Known to fail|                            |5.0, 6.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/65767] Test pr65276 failed on arm-none-eabi
  2015-04-15  2:52 [Bug lto/65767] New: Test pr65276 failed on arm-none-eabi amker at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-04-22 19:45 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-04 12:55 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-05-06 12:53 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-04 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65767

Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2015-05-04
                 CC|                            |ro at gcc dot gnu.org
         Resolution|FIXED                       |---
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #6 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Unfortunately, the fix broke the test completely on Solaris with /bin/ld:

Undefined                       first referenced
 symbol                             in file
std2::exception::~exception()       cp_lto_pr65276_1.o
std2::exception::~exception()       cp_lto_pr65276_1.o
std2::exception::~exception()       cp_lto_pr65276_1.o
ld: fatal: symbol referencing errors
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

  Rainer


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/65767] Test pr65276 failed on arm-none-eabi
  2015-04-15  2:52 [Bug lto/65767] New: Test pr65276 failed on arm-none-eabi amker at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-05-04 12:55 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-06 12:53 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
  2015-05-15  8:26 ` amker at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2015-05-06 12:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65767

Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ubizjak at gmail dot com

--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #6)
> Unfortunately, the fix broke the test completely on Solaris with /bin/ld:

Also seen on x86 CentOS 5.11:

cp_lto_pr65276_1.o: In function `std2::runtime_error::~runtime_error()':^M
pr65276_1.C:(.text._ZN4std213runtime_errorD2Ev[_ZN4std213runtime_errorD5Ev]+0x8):
undefined reference to `std2::exception::~exception()'^M
cp_lto_pr65276_1.o: In function `std2::runtime_error::~runtime_error()':^M
pr65276_1.C:(.text._ZN4std213runtime_errorD0Ev[_ZN4std213runtime_errorD5Ev]+0xc):
undefined reference to `std2::exception::~exception()'^M
cp_lto_pr65276_1.o:(.rodata._ZTVN4std29exceptionE[_ZTVN4std29exceptionE]+0x10):
undefined reference to `std2::exception::~exception()'^M
cp_lto_pr65276_1.o:(.rodata._ZTVN4std29exceptionE[_ZTVN4std29exceptionE]+0x18):
undefined reference to `std2::exception::~exception()'^M
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status^M
>From gcc-bugs-return-485634-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed May 06 12:54:41 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-485634-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 110678 invoked by alias); 6 May 2015 12:54:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 110650 invoked by uid 48); 6 May 2015 12:54:37 -0000
From: "t at sharklasers dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/66029] Build error compiling gcc5.1 using LTO
Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 12:54:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: t at sharklasers dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-66029-4-2qFvzew3vt@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66029-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66029-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00474.txt.bz2
Content-length: 636

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idf029

--- Comment #4 from JD <t at sharklasers dot com> ---
I tried as you advised; this is the configuration I'm trying to build:
  $ ../gcc-5.1.0/configure --prefix=gcc5.1 --enable-languages=c,c++
--enable-gold=yes --enable-ld=yes --enable-lto --enable-bootstrap
--with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --disable-multilib

The linker is:
GNU ld (GNU Binutils; openSUSE 13.2) 2.24.0.20140403-6.1

Information for package binutils:
---------------------------------
Repository: openSUSE-13.2-Oss
Name: binutils
Version: 2.24-6.1.7
Arch: x86_64
Vendor: openSUSE
Installed: Yes
Status: up-to-date


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/65767] Test pr65276 failed on arm-none-eabi
  2015-04-15  2:52 [Bug lto/65767] New: Test pr65276 failed on arm-none-eabi amker at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-05-06 12:53 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2015-05-15  8:26 ` amker at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-06-15 14:31 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: amker at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-15  8:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65767

--- Comment #8 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Oh, missed messages.  Will look into it.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/65767] Test pr65276 failed on arm-none-eabi
  2015-04-15  2:52 [Bug lto/65767] New: Test pr65276 failed on arm-none-eabi amker at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-05-15  8:26 ` amker at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-15 14:31 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-06-16 14:59 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-15 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65767

--- Comment #9 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It's been more than a month without any activity to fix this.  There's now also
PR testsuite/65944 about the same issue.

Please fix.
  Rainer


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/65767] Test pr65276 failed on arm-none-eabi
  2015-04-15  2:52 [Bug lto/65767] New: Test pr65276 failed on arm-none-eabi amker at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-06-15 14:31 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-16 14:59 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
  2015-06-16 15:00 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
  2015-06-18  2:11 ` amker at gcc dot gnu.org
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2015-06-16 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65767

--- Comment #11 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
*** Bug 65718 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-489100-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Jun 16 14:59:38 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-489100-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 114116 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2015 14:59:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 114035 invoked by uid 48); 16 Jun 2015 14:59:34 -0000
From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/65718] [5/6 Regression] g++.dg/lto/pr65276 FAILs
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:59:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.2
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-65718-4-QnNskC0Rz8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65718-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65718-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg01432.txt.bz2
Content-length: 493

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65718

Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
Dup.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 65767 ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-489103-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Jun 16 15:00:40 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-489103-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 124942 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2015 15:00:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 121826 invoked by uid 55); 16 Jun 2015 15:00:35 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/66251] [6 Regression] ICE in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1484
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 15:00:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: matz at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-66251-4-JOGNoGw4v3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66251-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66251-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg01435.txt.bz2
Content-length: 927

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idf251

--- Comment #18 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jun 16 15:00:03 2015
New Revision: 224523

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev"4523&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-06-16  Richard Biener  <rguenther@suse.de>

        Revert
        2015-06-01  Richard Biener  <rguenther@suse.de>

        Backport from mainline
        2015-05-26  Michael Matz  <matz@suse.de>

        PR middle-end/66251
        * tree-vect-stmts.c (vect_create_vectorized_demotion_stmts): Always set
        STMT_VINFO_VEC_STMT, also with SLP.

        2015-05-22  Richard Biener  <rguenther@suse.de>

        PR tree-optimization/66251
        * tree-vect-stmts.c (vectorizable_conversion): Properly
        set STMT_VINFO_VEC_STMT even for the SLP case.

Modified:
    branches/gcc-4_8-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
    branches/gcc-4_8-branch/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/65767] Test pr65276 failed on arm-none-eabi
  2015-04-15  2:52 [Bug lto/65767] New: Test pr65276 failed on arm-none-eabi amker at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-06-16 14:59 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2015-06-16 15:00 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
  2015-06-18  2:11 ` amker at gcc dot gnu.org
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2015-06-16 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65767

Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #9)
> It's been more than a month without any activity to fix this.  There's now
> also
> PR testsuite/65944 about the same issue.

Let's track testsuite issue in PR 65944. The original case is fixed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-489104-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Jun 16 15:02:50 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-489104-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 129436 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2015 15:02:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 129399 invoked by uid 48); 16 Jun 2015 15:02:47 -0000
From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/65944] [5/6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr65276: undefined reference to std2::exception::~exception()
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 15:02:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.2
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on target_milestone short_desc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-65944-4-BIYH5e9ki9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65944-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65944-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg01436.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1407

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65944

Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2015-06-16
   Target Milestone|---                         |5.2
            Summary|FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr65276:   |[5/6 Regression] FAIL:
                   |undefined reference to      |g++.dg/lto/pr65276:
                   |std2::exception::~exception |undefined reference to
                   |()                          |std2::exception::~exception
                   |                            |()
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
The following patch fixes the same link failure on x86_64 CentOS 5.11:

--cut here--
Index: g++.dg/lto/pr65276_0.C
===================================================================
--- g++.dg/lto/pr65276_0.C      (revision 224475)
+++ g++.dg/lto/pr65276_0.C      (working copy)
@@ -59,3 +59,5 @@
   };
   static ios_base::Init __ioinit;
 }
+
+std2::exception::~exception() noexcept { }
--cut here--
>From gcc-bugs-return-489105-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Jun 16 15:04:02 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-489105-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 130903 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2015 15:04:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 130810 invoked by uid 48); 16 Jun 2015 15:03:58 -0000
From: "christian.eggers at kathrein dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/65932] [5 Regression] Linux-3.10.75 on arm926ej-s does not boot due to wrong code generation
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 15:04:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical
X-Bugzilla-Who: christian.eggers at kathrein dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.2
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-65932-4-YYQ3gEXgz6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65932-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65932-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg01437.txt.bz2
Content-length: 557

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?ide932

--- Comment #15 from Christian Eggers <christian.eggers at kathrein dot de> ---
(In reply to Jim Wilson from comment #14)
> Created attachment 35775 [details]
> A possibly better patch, to modify ARM port to stop changing signed HI/QI to
> unsigned.
>
> This would require performance testing to see what the effect is.  This is a
> simpler patch than trying to change the out-of-ssa pass.

linux-3.10.75 boots successful when compiled by a gcc built with this patch.
Shall I also test the other patch?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/65767] Test pr65276 failed on arm-none-eabi
  2015-04-15  2:52 [Bug lto/65767] New: Test pr65276 failed on arm-none-eabi amker at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-06-16 15:00 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2015-06-18  2:11 ` amker at gcc dot gnu.org
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: amker at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-18  2:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65767

--- Comment #13 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #12)
> (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #9)
> > It's been more than a month without any activity to fix this.  There's now
> > also
> > PR testsuite/65944 about the same issue.
> 
> Let's track testsuite issue in PR 65944. The original case is fixed.

Hi Uroš,
Thanks very much for helping.  And sorry for late response because of long
vacation.
>From gcc-bugs-return-489263-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Jun 18 02:57:42 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-489263-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 46126 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2015 02:57:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 45498 invoked by uid 48); 18 Jun 2015 02:57:36 -0000
From: "olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/66358] [5/6 Regression] [SH] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2232
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 02:57:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.2
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-66358-4-yCnimn2a4b@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66358-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66358-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg01595.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1469

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idf358

Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2015-06-18
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #13 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #5)
> Created attachment 35673 [details]
> original test case
>
> My sh-elf compiler
>
> COLLECT_GCC=../xsh-elf-combined/build/gcc/xgcc
> Target: sh-unknown-elf
> Configured with: /exp/ldroot/dodes/xsh-elf-combined/combined/configure
> --target=sh-unknown-elf --disable-libssp --disable-libgomp
> --disable-libstdcxx-pch --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --enable-languages=c,c++
> --disable-shared --with-newlib --disable-nls
> --prefix=/exp/ldroot/dodes/xsh-elf-combined/install --with-headers=yes
> --disable-gdbtk --with-mpfr=/opt2/i686-pc-linux-gnu
> --with-gmp=/opt2/i686-pc-linux-gnu --without-libgloss
> Thread model: single
> gcc version 6.0.0 20150531 (experimental) (GCC)
>
> can reproduce it with -O2 -fpic -m4 -ml, though the bug looks a bit
> fragile like as other RA related bugs.  I've attached unreduced test
> case.  sh-elf compiler ICEs for this test case even with -O2 only here.

Confirmed with
gcc version 6.0.0 20150617 (experimental) (GCC)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-06-18  2:11 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-04-15  2:52 [Bug lto/65767] New: Test pr65276 failed on arm-none-eabi amker at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-15  7:50 ` [Bug lto/65767] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-15  9:51 ` amker at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-21  2:23 ` [Bug testsuite/65767] " amker at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-22  9:38 ` amker at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-22 19:45 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-04 12:55 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-06 12:53 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2015-05-15  8:26 ` amker at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-15 14:31 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-16 14:59 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2015-06-16 15:00 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2015-06-18  2:11 ` amker at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).