From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 80286 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2015 18:49:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 80224 invoked by uid 48); 22 Apr 2015 18:49:45 -0000 From: "ramana at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug lto/65778] v8 build fails with assembly error with LTO enabled on arm-linux-gnueabihf Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 18:49:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: lto X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg01928.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65778 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |ramana at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Can't you not use just a move instead of a ldr here? basically it is the > assembler which creates the constant pool here and that is too far from the > where the ldr is located because the function is "huge". Indeed the compiler has no role here. It's not like __ARM_NR_cacheflush is going to change is it ? You can write it similar to the libgcc implementation for clear_cache. regards Ramana