[Bug c/65781] New: gcc-5.1.0-RC-20150412 thinks it is 5.0.1

[Bug c/65781] New: gcc-5.1.0-RC-20150412 thinks it is 5.0.1

[zarniwhoop at ntlworld dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65781

            Bug ID: 65781
           Summary: gcc-5.1.0-RC-20150412 thinks it is 5.0.1
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: zarniwhoop at ntlworld dot com

Building 5.1.0-RC-20150412 the internal version is 5.0.1, e.g. with gcc
--version and also with a hard link of gcc-5.0.1 alongside gcc.

Looks as if gcc/BASE-VER was either missed or else suffered finger trouble.

[Bug c/65781] gcc-5.1.0-RC-20150412 thinks it is 5.0.1

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65781

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is expected,  GCC 5.1.0 is only when it is released.

[Bug c/65781] gcc-5.1.0-RC-20150412 thinks it is 5.0.1

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65781

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Please see https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html .

Basically 5.1.0 is the version for the released version 5.0.1 is for
prereleases.

[Bug c/65781] gcc-5.1.0-RC-20150412 thinks it is 5.0.1

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65781

--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Sure.

[Bug c/65781] gcc-5.1.0-RC-20150412 thinks it is 5.0.1

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65781

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
We'll need to do something with the *.gcda version numbers for the new
versioning scheme (because otherwise we'll run out of versions RSN), most
likely to start somehow encoding the major number in the former major and minor
characters and leave the patchlevel character for say the (minor << 1) |
patchlevel into the former patchlevel character, but then it would be better to
always keep patchlevel at 0 or 1.  So not sure if we want to use 5.0.2 for
RC2...