* [Bug target/65787] [5.1 regression] Miscompile due to bad vector swap optimization for little endian
2015-04-16 19:49 [Bug target/65787] New: [5.1 regression] Miscompile due to bad vector swap optimization for little endian wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-16 19:50 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-16 20:06 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-16 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65787
Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2015-04-16
Ever confirmed|0 |1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/65787] [5.1 regression] Miscompile due to bad vector swap optimization for little endian
2015-04-16 19:49 [Bug target/65787] New: [5.1 regression] Miscompile due to bad vector swap optimization for little endian wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-16 19:50 ` [Bug target/65787] " wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-16 20:06 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-16 20:08 ` [Bug target/65787] [5 Regression] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-16 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65787
--- Comment #1 from Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 35338
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35338&action=edit
Proposed patch
Attached patch appears to solve the problem, but I still need to do regression
testing.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/65787] [5 Regression] Miscompile due to bad vector swap optimization for little endian
2015-04-16 19:49 [Bug target/65787] New: [5.1 regression] Miscompile due to bad vector swap optimization for little endian wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-16 19:50 ` [Bug target/65787] " wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-16 20:06 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-16 20:08 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-16 21:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-16 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65787
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
Summary|[5.1 regression] Miscompile |[5 Regression] Miscompile
|due to bad vector swap |due to bad vector swap
|optimization for little |optimization for little
|endian |endian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/65787] [5 Regression] Miscompile due to bad vector swap optimization for little endian
2015-04-16 19:49 [Bug target/65787] New: [5.1 regression] Miscompile due to bad vector swap optimization for little endian wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-16 20:08 ` [Bug target/65787] [5 Regression] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-16 21:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-16 21:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-16 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65787
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The formatting looks weird, look how the case UNSPEC: is formatted -
{ goes below case PARALLEL:, two columns to the right, then another two columns
to the right the body of the scope, then } below the {.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/65787] [5 Regression] Miscompile due to bad vector swap optimization for little endian
2015-04-16 19:49 [Bug target/65787] New: [5.1 regression] Miscompile due to bad vector swap optimization for little endian wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-16 21:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-16 21:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-17 4:46 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-16 21:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65787
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Though, len is used just in one place, so perhaps even better just remove the
{}s and use
if (XVECLEN (op, 0) != 2)
return 0;
and drop len variable alltogether, it will be more readable that way.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/65787] [5 Regression] Miscompile due to bad vector swap optimization for little endian
2015-04-16 19:49 [Bug target/65787] New: [5.1 regression] Miscompile due to bad vector swap optimization for little endian wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-16 21:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-17 4:46 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-17 13:28 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-17 4:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65787
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Sorry, yeah, too much work on projects with different style guidelines. I
agree with removing the braces as in comment 3. Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/65787] [5 Regression] Miscompile due to bad vector swap optimization for little endian
2015-04-16 19:49 [Bug target/65787] New: [5.1 regression] Miscompile due to bad vector swap optimization for little endian wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-17 4:46 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-17 13:28 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-17 14:51 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-17 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65787
--- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Updated patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg00883.html.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/65787] [5 Regression] Miscompile due to bad vector swap optimization for little endian
2015-04-16 19:49 [Bug target/65787] New: [5.1 regression] Miscompile due to bad vector swap optimization for little endian wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-17 13:28 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-17 14:51 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-17 15:09 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-17 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65787
--- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Fri Apr 17 14:50:50 2015
New Revision: 222182
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222182&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2015-04-17 Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
PR target/65787
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rtx_is_swappable_p): Handle case where
vec_extract operation is wrapped in a PARALLEL with a CLOBBER.
(adjust_extract): Likewise.
[gcc/testsuite]
2015-04-17 Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
PR target/65787
* gcc.target/powerpc/pr65787.c: New.
Added:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr65787.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/65787] [5 Regression] Miscompile due to bad vector swap optimization for little endian
2015-04-16 19:49 [Bug target/65787] New: [5.1 regression] Miscompile due to bad vector swap optimization for little endian wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-17 14:51 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-17 15:09 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-17 20:36 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-17 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65787
--- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Jakub pointed out that this is actually a general problem with how I'm handling
PARALLELs elsewhere, which I had missed. Testing a slightly different patch
now.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/65787] [5 Regression] Miscompile due to bad vector swap optimization for little endian
2015-04-16 19:49 [Bug target/65787] New: [5.1 regression] Miscompile due to bad vector swap optimization for little endian wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-17 15:09 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-17 20:36 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-17 22:05 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-17 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65787
--- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Fri Apr 17 20:35:59 2015
New Revision: 222198
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222198&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-04-17 Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
PR target/65787
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rtx_is_swappable_p): Remove previous
fix; ensure that a subsequent SH_NONE operand does not overwrite
an existing *special value.
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/65787] [5 Regression] Miscompile due to bad vector swap optimization for little endian
2015-04-16 19:49 [Bug target/65787] New: [5.1 regression] Miscompile due to bad vector swap optimization for little endian wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-17 20:36 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-17 22:05 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-19 16:51 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-17 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65787
--- Comment #9 from Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Fri Apr 17 22:05:12 2015
New Revision: 222205
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222205&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2015-04-17 Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
PR target/65787
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rtx_is_swappable_p): Ensure that a
subsequent SH_NONE operand does not overwrite an existing *special
value.
(adjust_extract): Handle case where a vec_extract operation is
wrapped in a PARALLEL.
[gcc/testsuite]
2015-04-17 Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
PR target/65787
* gcc.target/powerpc/pr65787.c: New.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr65787.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/65787] [5 Regression] Miscompile due to bad vector swap optimization for little endian
2015-04-16 19:49 [Bug target/65787] New: [5.1 regression] Miscompile due to bad vector swap optimization for little endian wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-17 22:05 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-19 16:51 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-19 16:53 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-19 16:55 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-19 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65787
--- Comment #10 from Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Sun Apr 19 16:51:12 2015
New Revision: 222221
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222221&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2015-04-18 Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Backport from mainline r222205
2015-04-17 Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR target/65787
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rtx_is_swappable_p): Ensure that a
subsequent SH_NONE operand does not overwrite an existing *special
value.
(adjust_extract): Handle case where a vec_extract operation is
wrapped in a PARALLEL.
[gcc/testsuite]
2015-04-18 Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Backport from mainline r222205
2015-04-17 Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
PR target/65787
* gcc.target/powerpc/pr65787.c: New.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr65787.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/65787] [5 Regression] Miscompile due to bad vector swap optimization for little endian
2015-04-16 19:49 [Bug target/65787] New: [5.1 regression] Miscompile due to bad vector swap optimization for little endian wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-19 16:51 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-19 16:53 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-19 16:55 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-19 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65787
--- Comment #11 from Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Sun Apr 19 16:53:22 2015
New Revision: 222222
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222222&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2015-04-18 Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Backport from mainline r222205
2015-04-17 Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR target/65787
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rtx_is_swappable_p): Ensure that a
subsequent SH_NONE operand does not overwrite an existing *special
value.
(adjust_extract): Handle case where a vec_extract operation is
wrapped in a PARALLEL.
[gcc/testsuite]
2015-04-18 Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Backport from mainline r222205
2015-04-17 Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
PR target/65787
* gcc.target/powerpc/pr65787.c: New.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_8-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr65787.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_8-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_8-branch/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
branches/gcc-4_8-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/65787] [5 Regression] Miscompile due to bad vector swap optimization for little endian
2015-04-16 19:49 [Bug target/65787] New: [5.1 regression] Miscompile due to bad vector swap optimization for little endian wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-19 16:53 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-19 16:55 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-19 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65787
Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #12 from Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Work is complete.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread