From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-484028-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 22465 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2015 08:24:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 22402 invoked by uid 48); 20 Apr 2015 08:24:08 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/65802] [6 Regression] ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2335
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:24:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-65802-4-bc2PFdQeXS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65802-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65802-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg01580.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65802

--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to vries from comment #6)
> (In reply to vries from comment #5)
> > So the question is: should ifn_va_arg have ECF_NOTHROW?
> 
> Adding ECF_NOTHROW to ifn_va_arg also fixes the ICE.
> 
> And at gimplify_va_arg_expr, the VA_ARG_EXPR tree is non-throwing:

Is that always the case (try -fnon-call-exceptions)?  Then doing that looks
obvious.

Richard.

> (gdb) call debug_generic_expr (*expr_p )
> VA_ARG_EXPR <c>
> (gdb) call debug_tree (*expr_p )
>  <va_arg_expr 0x7ffff661e9a0
>     type <pointer_type 0x7ffff64c97e0
>         type <integer_type 0x7ffff64a7690 int public SI
>             size <integer_cst 0x7ffff64c50a8 constant 32>
>             unit size <integer_cst 0x7ffff64c50c0 constant 4>
>             align 32 symtab 0 alias set -1 canonical type 0x7ffff64a7690
> precision 32 min <integer_cst 0x7ffff64c5060 -2147483648> max <integer_cst
> 0x7ffff64c5078 2147483647>
>             pointer_to_this <pointer_type 0x7ffff64c97e0>>
>         sizes-gimplified unsigned DI
>         size <integer_cst 0x7ffff64a3e58 constant 64>
>         unit size <integer_cst 0x7ffff64a3e70 constant 8>
>         align 64 symtab 0 alias set -1 canonical type 0x7ffff64c97e0
>         pointer_to_this <pointer_type 0x7ffff6622540>>
>     side-effects
>     arg 0 <var_decl 0x7ffff64b0c60 c
>         type <array_type 0x7ffff64ccbd0 __builtin_va_list type <record_type
> 0x7ffff64cc738 __va_list_tag>
>             sizes-gimplified BLK
>             size <integer_cst 0x7ffff64c5318 constant 192>
>             unit size <integer_cst 0x7ffff64c52e8 constant 24>
>             align 64 symtab 0 alias set -1 canonical type 0x7ffff64cc888
> domain <integer_type 0x7ffff64cc7e0>>
>         used tree_1 decl_5 BLK file test.cc line 13 col 25 size <integer_cst
> 0x7ffff64c5318 192> unit size <integer_cst 0x7ffff64c52e8 24>
>         align 64 context <function_decl 0x7ffff66240d8 fn1>>
>     test.cc:15:32>
> (gdb) call tree_could_throw_p (*expr_p )
> $1 = false
> ...
> 
> I'll bootstrap and reg-test this fix.