From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-484009-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 127293 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2015 17:42:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 127267 invoked by uid 48); 19 Apr 2015 17:42:09 -0000
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/65802] [6 Regression] ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2335
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 17:42:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-65802-4-x2UiJ0tNJp@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65802-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65802-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg01561.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65802

--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This patch allows the example to pass:
...
diff --git a/gcc/passes.def b/gcc/passes.def
index ffa63b5..041197c 100644
--- a/gcc/passes.def
+++ b/gcc/passes.def
@@ -344,7 +344,6 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
       NEXT_PASS (pass_tm_edges);
   POP_INSERT_PASSES ()
   NEXT_PASS (pass_vtable_verify);
-  NEXT_PASS (pass_lower_vaarg);
   NEXT_PASS (pass_lower_vector);
   NEXT_PASS (pass_lower_complex_O0);
   NEXT_PASS (pass_asan_O0);
@@ -352,6 +351,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
   NEXT_PASS (pass_sanopt);
   NEXT_PASS (pass_cleanup_eh);
   NEXT_PASS (pass_lower_resx);
+  NEXT_PASS (pass_lower_vaarg);
   NEXT_PASS (pass_nrv);
   NEXT_PASS (pass_cleanup_cfg_post_optimizing);
   NEXT_PASS (pass_warn_function_noreturn);
...

I have no knowledge of the exception handling implementation, so:
1. a proper root cause analysis would take me some time.
2. I have no idea whether the patch is actually correct.  I'll try a bootstrap
   and reg-test though, that'll gives us at least more information.