public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dave.anglin at bell dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/65818] [6 Regression] libiberty/vprintf-support.c:41:1: ICE: in expand_i fn_va_arg_1, at tree-stdarg.c:1095
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:21:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-65818-4-GD0YiKPma7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-65818-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65818
--- Comment #9 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2015-04-22, at 12:40 PM, vries at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> this patch is more conservative:
> ...
> diff --git a/gcc/gimplify.c b/gcc/gimplify.c
> index 7786e16..e23f510 100644
> --- a/gcc/gimplify.c
> +++ b/gcc/gimplify.c
> @@ -9336,7 +9336,12 @@ gimplify_va_arg_internal (tree valist, tree type,
> location_t loc,
> else
> gimplify_expr (&valist, pre_p, post_p, is_gimple_min_lval, fb_lvalue);
>
> - return targetm.gimplify_va_arg_expr (valist, type, pre_p, post_p);
> + tree expr = targetm.gimplify_va_arg_expr (valist, type, pre_p, post_p);
> + gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (expr) == MEM_REF);
> + if (!is_gimple_mem_ref_addr (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0)))
> + gimplify_expr (&TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0), pre_p, post_p,
> + is_gimple_mem_ref_addr, fb_rvalue);
> + return expr;
> }
>
> /* Gimplify __builtin_va_arg, aka VA_ARG_EXPR, which is not really a
This patch has the following new failure:
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr65802.C: In function 'void fn1()':
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr65802.C:20:23: error: impossible
constraint in 'asm'
FAIL: g++.dg/pr65802.C -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pr65802.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pr65802.C -std=gnu++14 (test for excess errors)
--
John David Anglin dave.anglin@bell.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-24 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-20 20:44 [Bug tree-optimization/65818] New: " danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-20 20:49 ` [Bug tree-optimization/65818] " danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-21 7:45 ` [Bug tree-optimization/65818] [6 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-21 18:50 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-22 6:44 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-22 7:02 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-22 7:15 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-22 11:25 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2015-04-22 16:40 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-22 16:58 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2015-04-24 11:21 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net [this message]
2015-04-24 16:40 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-24 20:30 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-25 12:36 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-26 11:13 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-28 6:05 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-28 6:10 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-65818-4-GD0YiKPma7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).