From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-484115-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 93340 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2015 21:15:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 93283 invoked by uid 48); 20 Apr 2015 21:15:27 -0000
From: "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/65819] New: overzealous checking in gfc_check_dependency for identical=true
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 21:15:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter
Message-ID: <bug-65819-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg01667.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65819

            Bug ID: 65819
           Summary: overzealous checking in gfc_check_dependency for
                    identical=true
           Product: gcc
           Version: 6.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org

Just ran across this while trying to cook up a test case for matrix inlining.

In the patch proposed for PR 37131, I have

  if (gfc_check_dependency (expr1, matrix_a, true)
      || gfc_check_dependency (expr1, matrix_b, true))
    return 0;

In the test case, I want to do

  f(3,1:eight:2,:) = matmul(f(1,1:3,2:3), f(2,2:3,:))

where clearly the lhs does not depend on the rhs.  However, specifying true to
gfc_dep_dependency leads to

      if (identical)
    return 1;

before any checking is done.  I'm not sure if there is a real-world test
case yet, but there will be one soon, so I'll keep this PR as a reminder.