* [Bug target/65836] [6 Regression] gnat fails to build on aarch64-linux-gnu
[not found] <bug-65836-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2015-04-21 17:04 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-21 17:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-21 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65836
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
but other languages build fine?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug target/65836] [6 Regression] gnat fails to build on aarch64-linux-gnu
[not found] <bug-65836-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2015-04-21 17:04 ` [Bug target/65836] [6 Regression] gnat fails to build on aarch64-linux-gnu ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-21 17:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-22 8:54 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-21 17:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65836
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This might be the same bug as 65824.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug target/65836] [6 Regression] gnat fails to build on aarch64-linux-gnu
[not found] <bug-65836-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2015-04-21 17:04 ` [Bug target/65836] [6 Regression] gnat fails to build on aarch64-linux-gnu ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-21 17:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-22 8:54 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-22 9:07 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-22 8:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65836
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug target/65836] [6 Regression] gnat fails to build on aarch64-linux-gnu
[not found] <bug-65836-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-22 8:54 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-22 9:07 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-22 13:35 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-22 9:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65836
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |build
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-04-22
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Confirmed, this is a bootstrap failure though (ada isn't the problem)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug target/65836] [6 Regression] gnat fails to build on aarch64-linux-gnu
[not found] <bug-65836-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-22 9:07 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-22 13:35 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-22 13:54 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-26 11:19 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-22 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65836
--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Bisection confirmed that it's r222173:
Author: vries <vries@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>
Date: Fri Apr 17 09:26:59 2015 +0000
Postpone expanding va_arg until pass_stdarg
2015-04-17 Tom de Vries <tom@codesourcery.com>
Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>
I'll try updating my tree to r222318
Author: vries <vries@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>
Date: Wed Apr 22 09:03:01 2015 +0000
Fix va_arg ap_copy nop detection
2015-04-22 Tom de Vries <tom@codesourcery.com>
PR tree-optimization/65823
* gimplify.c (gimplify_modify_expr): Use operand_equal_p to test for
equality between ap_copy and ap.
and see if that fixes it
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug target/65836] [6 Regression] gnat fails to build on aarch64-linux-gnu
[not found] <bug-65836-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-22 13:35 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-22 13:54 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-26 11:19 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-22 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65836
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tom at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #4)
> and see if that fixes it
No, that didn't fix it. This is still present as of r222322
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug target/65836] [6 Regression] gnat fails to build on aarch64-linux-gnu
[not found] <bug-65836-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-22 13:54 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-26 11:19 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: vries at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-26 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65836
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Possibly a duplicate of(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> This might be the same bug as 65824.
For now I'm assuming this is a duplicate of PR65824, which I just marked as a
duplicate of PR65818 (for which a patch has been proposed).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread