From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 40611 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2015 17:23:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 40575 invoked by uid 48); 23 Apr 2015 17:23:07 -0000 From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/65864] Consider emitting -Wswitch-bool less aggressively? Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 17:23:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg02052.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65864 --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek --- I think they should simply cast the controlling expression to int--that should quash the warning. Does this workaround sound reasonable to them?