public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/65892] gcc fails to implement N685 aliasing of union members
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 14:42:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-65892-4-AoT6fycsuv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-65892-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65892

--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Message [c++std-core-20893] on the C++ core reflector on 2011-12-14 supports
the GCC view that a C++ compiler can apply strict aliasing rules to p1->m and
p2->m unless the fact they come from the same object is visible to the
compiler.

<quote>
| Either I'm mistaken, or it is a 'magical property of unions'. If the
| compiler can figure out two objects didn't come form the same union,
| it can assume they do not alias,

Yes.  I believe I filled a core issue regarding this -- coming from
controversy originating from optimizations performed by compilers
today (especially without full program analysis) -- and the resolution
is that if intend to play type punning games with X and Y you better let
the type checker and optimizer see your cards upfront.  Otherwise, you
are on your own.  I can't remember the issue number right now.  In the
end, I think that was the right decision.
</quote>

But I can't find the core issue referred to.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-09-09 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-25 23:59 [Bug c/65892] New: " msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-26  0:11 ` [Bug c/65892] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-26  0:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-26  0:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-26 17:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-26 18:00 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-27  9:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-27 14:57 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-28 17:08 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2015-05-13 16:02 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-21 11:41 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-09-09  0:39 ` myriachan at gmail dot com
2015-09-09  0:43 ` myriachan at gmail dot com
2015-09-09 13:44 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2015-09-09 14:25 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-09-09 14:42 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2015-09-09 15:59 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2018-04-23 14:27 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-65892-4-AoT6fycsuv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).