public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "juergen.reuter at desy dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/65894] [6 Regression] severe regression in gfortran 6.0.0
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 05:36:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-65894-4-YDO07T1Miw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-65894-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894

--- Comment #28 from Jürgen Reuter <juergen.reuter at desy dot de> ---
Dominique, comment #27 looks perfect. That would be great for us with the
upcoming revision of gfortran 6.0.0.
>From gcc-bugs-return-485817-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri May 08 05:41:56 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-485817-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 115687 invoked by alias); 8 May 2015 05:41:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 115650 invoked by uid 48); 8 May 2015 05:41:52 -0000
From: "glisse at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/66064]=?UTF-8?Q? under O2 level ,x86-64 compiler ICE,informance:internal compiler error?=: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1894
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 05:41:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_known_to_work resolution cf_known_to_fail
Message-ID: <bug-66064-4-he95JDmicC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66064-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66064-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00657.txt.bz2
Content-length: 731

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idf064

Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
      Known to work|                            |4.8.4
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
      Known to fail|                            |4.7.4

--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
4.7 is not supported anymore. All current release branches seem fine.

(if you have a contract with suse, you can try to ask them about backporting
patches in their distribution, I don't know how that works)


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-08  5:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-26 14:35 [Bug fortran/65894] New: " juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2015-04-26 15:02 ` [Bug fortran/65894] " juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2015-04-27  9:20 ` [Bug fortran/65894] [6 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-27  9:27 ` vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-27  9:40 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2015-04-27  9:41 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2015-04-27 16:56 ` vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-28  6:33 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-04-28 11:59 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2015-04-28 16:10 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2015-05-05 17:12 ` vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-05 17:35 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2015-05-05 18:06 ` vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-06  6:54 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-05-07  9:54 ` vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-07  9:57 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2015-05-07 10:09 ` vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-07 10:14 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2015-05-07 12:10 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2015-05-07 12:20 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-05-07 12:22 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2015-05-07 12:38 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2015-05-07 19:27 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-05-07 20:46 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-05-08  5:36 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de [this message]
2015-05-08 12:47 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-05-08 18:53 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-05-09 13:36 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-10 13:40 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-65894-4-YDO07T1Miw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).