From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-484947-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 76771 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2015 09:06:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 76666 invoked by uid 48); 29 Apr 2015 09:05:59 -0000
From: "rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgcc/65902] GCC-5.1 fails to bootstrap for eCos/arm-eabi
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 09:06:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libgcc
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-65902-4-08Xirwh70V@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65902-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65902-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg02499.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65902

Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #6 from Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #5)
> Well, I thought maybe it would not hurt to be more permissive...
> 
> At least math.h and stdlib.h include <cyg/infra/cyg_type.h>
> which contains something like this:
> 
> #ifndef __cplusplus
> 
> typedef cyg_halbool bool;
> 
> # ifndef false
> #  define false 0
> # endif
> 
> # ifndef true
> #  define true (!false)
> # endif
> 
> #endif

Neither of those headers should be doing that...

I think you'll find more packages than just GCC are going to fail to build if
they do.