public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/65908] [5/6 Regression] ICE: in expand_thunk, at cgraphunit.c:1700
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 14:08:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-65908-4-R9jopVhm5T@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-65908-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65908

--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 35533
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35533&action=edit
Suggested fix

I've been testing following patch for 5.1.0 branch. I'm wondering if comparison
of just TYPE_ARG_TYPES is sufficient?
>From gcc-bugs-return-486142-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue May 12 14:17:51 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-486142-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 115429 invoked by alias); 12 May 2015 14:17:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 115402 invoked by uid 48); 12 May 2015 14:17:47 -0000
From: "mikael at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/66089] [6 Regression] elemental dependency mishandling when derived types are involved
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 14:17:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-66089-4-FyXrA823yj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66089-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66089-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00982.txt.bz2
Content-length: 390

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idf089

--- Comment #4 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3)
> The code in comment 0 does not abort at run time up to revision r222352
> (2015-04-23), but does so at r222398 (2015-04-24), likely r222361.

Yes, probably the change in gfc_add_loop_ss_code (which comment #1 removes).


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-12 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-27 17:34 [Bug c++/65908] New: internal compiler error: in expand_thunk mark at noffle dot net
2015-04-27 17:47 ` [Bug c++/65908] " mark at noffle dot net
2015-04-27 17:59 ` [Bug ipa/65908] [5/6 Regression] ICE: in expand_thunk, at cgraphunit.c:1700 trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-27 22:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-27 23:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-28  8:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-11 11:50 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-12 14:08 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2015-05-12 19:44 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-17 13:24 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-17 13:29 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-22  7:12 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-03  9:11 ` [Bug ipa/65908] [5 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-16  9:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-65908-4-R9jopVhm5T@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).