From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 82046 invoked by alias); 12 May 2015 14:08:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 81880 invoked by uid 48); 12 May 2015 14:08:41 -0000 From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/65908] [5/6 Regression] ICE: in expand_thunk, at cgraphunit.c:1700 Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 14:08:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.2 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00981.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D65908 --- Comment #7 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka --- Created attachment 35533 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D35533&action=3Dedit Suggested fix I've been testing following patch for 5.1.0 branch. I'm wondering if compar= ison of just TYPE_ARG_TYPES is sufficient? >>From gcc-bugs-return-486142-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue May 12 14:17:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 115429 invoked by alias); 12 May 2015 14:17:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 115402 invoked by uid 48); 12 May 2015 14:17:47 -0000 From: "mikael at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/66089] [6 Regression] elemental dependency mishandling when derived types are involved Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 14:17:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mikael at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00982.txt.bz2 Content-length: 390 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Morin --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3) > The code in comment 0 does not abort at run time up to revision r222352 > (2015-04-23), but does so at r222398 (2015-04-24), likely r222361. Yes, probably the change in gfc_add_loop_ss_code (which comment #1 removes).