public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/65912] New: x_rtl.x_frame_offset not updated after frame related insn deleted
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 09:40:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-65912-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65912

            Bug ID: 65912
           Summary: x_rtl.x_frame_offset not updated after frame related
                    insn deleted
           Product: gcc
           Version: 6.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: rtl-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

given the following simple test.c

typedef unsigned long int uint64_t;
typedef __Uint8x8_t uint8x8_t;

typedef struct uint8x8x4_t
{
  uint8x8_t val[4];
} uint8x8x4_t;

__inline uint8x8_t
bar (uint64_t __a)
{
  return (uint8x8_t) __a;
}

uint8x8x4_t foo(uint8x8x4_t v1, uint8x8x4_t v2)
{
  return (uint8x8x4_t){{bar(0), bar(0), bar(0), bar(0)}};
}

on aarch64, compile it with "./cc1-aarch64 -std=c99 -Wall -O3
-ftree-vectorizer-verbose=3"

foo:
        movi    v0.2s, 0
        sub     sp, sp, #128  <== useless stack adjustment
        add     sp, sp, 128   <== useless stack adjustment
        ...

There are useless stack adjustment. A quick investigation shows it's caued by
we first decide to put the return value on stack, then later optimized them
into registers, and all those store to stack are deleted by dse1, but stack
space required kept in x_rtl->x_frame_offset is not updated accordingly.

Although I run into this issue on AArch64, I highly suspect it's a generic
issue when the type of return value is very complex.

Has anyone run into this issue on other architecture like MIPS, PPC?


             reply	other threads:[~2015-04-28  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-28  9:40 jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2015-04-28 16:25 ` pinskia
2015-06-25 21:23 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/65912] " ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-25 21:23 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-19  0:26 ` [Bug middle-end/65912] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-65912-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).