public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
       [not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2015-04-30 21:08 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-30 21:10 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (14 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: vries at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-30 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955

--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35433
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35433&action=edit
Sources in tgz

Using these sources, I can reproduce using just this command line:
...
build/./prev-gcc/xgcc -Bbuild/./prev-gcc/ -Binstall/arm-linux-gnueabihf/bin/
-Binstall/arm-linux-gnueabihf/bin/ -Binstall/arm-linux-gnueabihf/lib/  -c -g
-O2 -gtoggle -gnatpg -gnata  -nostdinc sem_eval.adb
...


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
       [not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2015-04-30 21:08 ` [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split vries at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-30 21:10 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-30 21:14 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: vries at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-30 21:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955

--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
$ build/./prev-gcc/xgcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=build/./prev-gcc/xgcc
Target: arm-linux-gnueabihf
Configured with: src/configure --prefix=install --with-cloog=infra
--with-ppl=infra --with-gmp=infra --with-mpfr=infra --with-mpc=infra
--with-isl=infra --enable-checking=yes,rtl
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,go,java,objc,obj-c++,ada
--build=arm-linux-gnueabihf --host=arm-linux-gnueabihf
--target=arm-linux-gnueabihf --enable-multiarch --disable-multilib
--disable-sjlj-exceptions --with-arch=armv7-a --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16
--with-float=hard --with-mode=thumb --with-system-zlib --disable-libmudflap
--disable-libitm --disable-libquadmath --with-sysroot=/ --enable-threads=posix
--enable-shared
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20150421 (experimental) (GCC)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
       [not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2015-04-30 21:08 ` [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split vries at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-30 21:10 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-30 21:14 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-04-30 22:33 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: vries at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-30 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955

vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |davidxl at google dot com

--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
ICE is in fix introduced for PR63209 - [ARM] Wrong conditional move generated,
cc-ing author.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
       [not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-04-30 21:14 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-30 22:33 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-05-01  8:56 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-30 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955

ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

> 
> Aforementioned split (and define_insn) as a whole:
> ...
>   9306  (define_insn_and_split "movcond_addsi"
>   9307    [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "s_register_operand" "=r,l,r")
>   9308          (if_then_else:SI
>   9309           (match_operator 5 "comparison_operator"
>   9310            [(plus:SI (match_operand:SI 3 "s_register_operand" "r,r,r")
>   9311                      (match_operand:SI 4 "arm_add_operand"
> "rIL,rIL,rIL"))
>   9312              (const_int 0)])
>   9313           (match_operand:SI 1 "arm_rhs_operand" "rI,rPy,r")
>   9314           (match_operand:SI 2 "arm_rhs_operand" "rI,rPy,r")))
>   9315     (clobber (reg:CC CC_REGNUM))]
>   9316     "TARGET_32BIT"
>   9317     "#"
>   9318     "&& reload_completed"
>   9319    [(set (reg:CC_NOOV CC_REGNUM)
>   9320          (compare:CC_NOOV
>   9321           (plus:SI (match_dup 3)
>   9322                    (match_dup 4))
>   9323           (const_int 0)))
>   9324     (set (match_dup 0) (match_dup 1))
>   9325     (cond_exec (match_dup 6)
>   9326                (set (match_dup 0) (match_dup 2)))]
>   9327    "
>   9328    {
>   9329      machine_mode mode = SELECT_CC_MODE (GET_CODE (operands[5]),
>   9330                                               operands[3],
> operands[4]);
>   9331      enum rtx_code rc = GET_CODE (operands[5]);
>   9332      operands[6] = gen_rtx_REG (mode, CC_REGNUM);
>   9333      gcc_assert (!(mode == CCFPmode || mode == CCFPEmode));
>   9334      if (REGNO (operands[2]) != REGNO (operands[0]))
>   9335        rc = reverse_condition (rc);
>   9336      else
>   9337        std::swap (operands[1], operands[2]);
>   9338
>   9339      operands[6] = gen_rtx_fmt_ee (rc, VOIDmode, operands[6],


Seems like the check on operands[2] should be:
     if (!REG_P (operands[2]) || REGNO (operands[2]) != REGNO (operands[0]))
       rc = reverse_condition (rc);
     else
       std::swap (operands[1], operands[2]);


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
       [not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-04-30 22:33 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-01  8:56 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-05-05  9:51 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-01  8:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955

ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2015-05-01
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35434
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35434&action=edit
Proposed fix

Could you please give this patch a try?
Unfortunately I don't have ada on my arm system so I can't try it out at the
moment.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
       [not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-05-01  8:56 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-05  9:51 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-05-05  9:57 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: vries at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-05  9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955

--- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #5)
> Created attachment 35434 [details]
> Proposed fix
> 
> Could you please give this patch a try?
> Unfortunately I don't have ada on my arm system so I can't try it out at the
> moment.

I managed to complete a bootstrap using the patch.

I'm now doing a nobootstrap build and test with and without the patch.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
       [not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-05-05  9:51 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-05  9:57 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-05-05 10:16 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: vries at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-05  9:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955

--- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #6)
> I'm now doing a nobootstrap build and test with and without the patch.

I have reproduced the failure using the nobootstrap build:
...
build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran
-Bbuild/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../
-Bbuild/arm-linux-gnueabihf/./libgfortran/
src/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr43984.f90 -fno-diagnostics-show-caret
-fdiagnostics-color=never -O -O2 -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fdump-tree-pre -S -o
pr43984.s
src/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr43984.f90:49:0: internal compiler error: RTL
check: expected code 'reg', have 'const_int' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1710
0x886fd5 rtl_check_failed_code1(rtx_def const*, rtx_code, char const*, int,
char const*)
        src/gcc/rtl.c:731
0xcd9c25 rhs_regno
        src/gcc/rtl.h:1710
0xd0f6bb gen_split_2634(rtx_insn*, rtx_def**)
        src/gcc/config/arm/arm.md:9341
0x110a23d split_7
        src/gcc/config/arm/arm.md:9326
0x1118f0f split_12
        src/gcc/config/arm/neon.md:4372
0x111fd37 split_insns(rtx_def*, rtx_def*)
        src/gcc/config/arm/sync.md:379
0x4f0d59 try_split(rtx_def*, rtx_def*, int)
        src/gcc/emit-rtl.c:3664
0x81e53b split_insn
        src/gcc/recog.c:2919
0x81e925 split_all_insns()
        src/gcc/recog.c:3009
0x8215e1 rest_of_handle_split_after_reload
        src/gcc/recog.c:3956
0x821625 execute
        src/gcc/recog.c:3985
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
compiler exited with status 1

FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr43984.f90   -O  (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr43984.f90   -O  (test for excess errors)
...


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
       [not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-05-05  9:57 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-05 10:16 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-05-05 10:23 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-05 10:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955

--- Comment #8 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #7)
> (In reply to vries from comment #6)
> > I'm now doing a nobootstrap build and test with and without the patch.
> 
> I have reproduced the failure using the nobootstrap build:

<snip>

> 
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr43984.f90   -O  (internal compiler error)
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr43984.f90   -O  (test for excess errors)
> ...

You mean without my patch, right? (hopefully ;))
I can't reproduce it on my cross build with
-mthumb/-march=armv7-a/-mfloat-abi=hard/-mfpu=vfpv3-d16 unfortunately


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
       [not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-05-05 10:16 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-05 10:23 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-05-05 10:51 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: vries at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-05 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955

--- Comment #9 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #8)
> (In reply to vries from comment #7)
> > (In reply to vries from comment #6)
> > > I'm now doing a nobootstrap build and test with and without the patch.
> > 
> > I have reproduced the failure using the nobootstrap build:
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > 
> > FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr43984.f90   -O  (internal compiler error)
> > FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr43984.f90   -O  (test for excess errors)
> > ...
> 
> You mean without my patch, right? (hopefully ;))

Yes :)

> I can't reproduce it on my cross build with
> -mthumb/-march=armv7-a/-mfloat-abi=hard/-mfpu=vfpv3-d16 unfortunately

with checking=yes,rtl?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
       [not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-05-05 10:23 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-05 10:51 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-05-06 13:20 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-05 10:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955

--- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

> > I can't reproduce it on my cross build with
> > -mthumb/-march=armv7-a/-mfloat-abi=hard/-mfpu=vfpv3-d16 unfortunately
> 
> with checking=yes,rtl?

Ah yes, with --enable-checking=yes,rtl I can reproduce it, and confirm that it
goes away with the patch.
I have posted the patch at
 https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-05/msg00284.html

Thanks for investigating!


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
       [not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-05-05 10:51 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-06 13:20 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-05-12  9:15 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: vries at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-06 13:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955

--- Comment #11 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #6)
> I'm now doing a nobootstrap build and test with and without the patch.

Test results:
...
$ diff -I guality -u FAILs.222758 FAILs.222758.patched
--- FAILs.222758        2015-05-05 19:07:39.000000000 +0800
+++ FAILs.222758.patched        2015-05-06 21:14:10.000000000 +0800
@@ -374,12 +379,6 @@
 nobootstrap/build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.sum:FAIL:
gfortran.dg/class_allocate_18.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
execution test
 nobootstrap/build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.sum:FAIL:
gfortran.dg/class_allocate_18.f90   -O3 -g  execution test
 nobootstrap/build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.sum:FAIL:
gfortran.dg/class_allocate_18.f90   -Os  execution test
-nobootstrap/build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.sum:FAIL:
gfortran.dg/pr43984.f90   -O  (internal compiler error)
-nobootstrap/build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.sum:FAIL:
gfortran.dg/pr43984.f90   -O  (test for excess errors)
-nobootstrap/build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.sum:FAIL:
gfortran.dg/transfer_array_intrinsic_3.f90   -Os  (internal compiler error)
-nobootstrap/build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.sum:FAIL:
gfortran.dg/transfer_array_intrinsic_3.f90   -Os  (test for excess errors)
-nobootstrap/build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.sum:FAIL:
gfortran.dg/transfer_assumed_size_1.f90   -Os  (internal compiler error)
-nobootstrap/build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.sum:FAIL:
gfortran.dg/transfer_assumed_size_1.f90   -Os  (test for excess errors)
 nobootstrap/build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.sum:FAIL:
gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_6.f90   -O0  execution test
 nobootstrap/build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.sum:FAIL:
gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_6.f90   -O1  execution test
 nobootstrap/build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.sum:FAIL:
gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_6.f90   -O2  execution test
...


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
       [not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-05-06 13:20 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-12  9:15 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-05-12  9:21 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-12  9:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955

--- Comment #12 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue May 12 09:15:09 2015
New Revision: 223049

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223049&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] Fix PR 65955: Do not take REGNO on non-REG operand in movcond_addsi

        PR target/65955
        * config/arm/arm.md (movcond_addsi): Check that operands[2] is a
        REG before taking its REGNO.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/config/arm/arm.md


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
       [not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-05-12  9:15 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-12  9:21 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-05-13 15:01 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-12  9:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955

ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to work|                            |6.0
   Target Milestone|---                         |5.2
      Known to fail|                            |4.9.3, 5.0

--- Comment #13 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed on trunk. Will be backporting if testing on trunk shows no problem and
testing on branches goes ok


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
       [not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-05-12  9:21 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-13 15:01 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-05-13 15:03 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-05-14 14:28 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-13 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955

--- Comment #14 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Wed May 13 15:00:50 2015
New Revision: 223165

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223165&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] Fix PR 65955: Do not take REGNO on non-REG operand in movcond_addsi

        Backport from mainline
        2015-05-12  Kyrylo Tkachov  <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>

        PR target/65955
        * config/arm/arm.md (movcond_addsi): Check that operands[2] is a
        REG before taking its REGNO.

Modified:
    branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
    branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/config/arm/arm.md


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
       [not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-05-13 15:01 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-13 15:03 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-05-14 14:28 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-13 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955

ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to fail|5.0                         |5.1.0

--- Comment #15 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Backported to GCC 5.
4.9 is next up after testing


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
       [not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (14 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-05-13 15:03 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-14 14:28 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-14 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955

ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #17 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Should now be fixed on GCC 6, 5 and 4.9 branches.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-05-14 14:28 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2015-04-30 21:08 ` [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-30 21:10 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-30 21:14 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-30 22:33 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-01  8:56 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-05  9:51 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-05  9:57 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-05 10:16 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-05 10:23 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-05 10:51 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-06 13:20 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-12  9:15 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-12  9:21 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-13 15:01 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-13 15:03 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-14 14:28 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).