* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
[not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2015-04-30 21:08 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-30 21:10 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: vries at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-30 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35433
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35433&action=edit
Sources in tgz
Using these sources, I can reproduce using just this command line:
...
build/./prev-gcc/xgcc -Bbuild/./prev-gcc/ -Binstall/arm-linux-gnueabihf/bin/
-Binstall/arm-linux-gnueabihf/bin/ -Binstall/arm-linux-gnueabihf/lib/ -c -g
-O2 -gtoggle -gnatpg -gnata -nostdinc sem_eval.adb
...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
[not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2015-04-30 21:08 ` [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split vries at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-30 21:10 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-30 21:14 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: vries at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-30 21:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
$ build/./prev-gcc/xgcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=build/./prev-gcc/xgcc
Target: arm-linux-gnueabihf
Configured with: src/configure --prefix=install --with-cloog=infra
--with-ppl=infra --with-gmp=infra --with-mpfr=infra --with-mpc=infra
--with-isl=infra --enable-checking=yes,rtl
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,go,java,objc,obj-c++,ada
--build=arm-linux-gnueabihf --host=arm-linux-gnueabihf
--target=arm-linux-gnueabihf --enable-multiarch --disable-multilib
--disable-sjlj-exceptions --with-arch=armv7-a --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16
--with-float=hard --with-mode=thumb --with-system-zlib --disable-libmudflap
--disable-libitm --disable-libquadmath --with-sysroot=/ --enable-threads=posix
--enable-shared
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20150421 (experimental) (GCC)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
[not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2015-04-30 21:08 ` [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-30 21:10 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-30 21:14 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-04-30 22:33 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: vries at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-30 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |davidxl at google dot com
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
ICE is in fix introduced for PR63209 - [ARM] Wrong conditional move generated,
cc-ing author.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
[not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-30 21:14 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-04-30 22:33 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-01 8:56 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-30 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
>
> Aforementioned split (and define_insn) as a whole:
> ...
> 9306 (define_insn_and_split "movcond_addsi"
> 9307 [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "s_register_operand" "=r,l,r")
> 9308 (if_then_else:SI
> 9309 (match_operator 5 "comparison_operator"
> 9310 [(plus:SI (match_operand:SI 3 "s_register_operand" "r,r,r")
> 9311 (match_operand:SI 4 "arm_add_operand"
> "rIL,rIL,rIL"))
> 9312 (const_int 0)])
> 9313 (match_operand:SI 1 "arm_rhs_operand" "rI,rPy,r")
> 9314 (match_operand:SI 2 "arm_rhs_operand" "rI,rPy,r")))
> 9315 (clobber (reg:CC CC_REGNUM))]
> 9316 "TARGET_32BIT"
> 9317 "#"
> 9318 "&& reload_completed"
> 9319 [(set (reg:CC_NOOV CC_REGNUM)
> 9320 (compare:CC_NOOV
> 9321 (plus:SI (match_dup 3)
> 9322 (match_dup 4))
> 9323 (const_int 0)))
> 9324 (set (match_dup 0) (match_dup 1))
> 9325 (cond_exec (match_dup 6)
> 9326 (set (match_dup 0) (match_dup 2)))]
> 9327 "
> 9328 {
> 9329 machine_mode mode = SELECT_CC_MODE (GET_CODE (operands[5]),
> 9330 operands[3],
> operands[4]);
> 9331 enum rtx_code rc = GET_CODE (operands[5]);
> 9332 operands[6] = gen_rtx_REG (mode, CC_REGNUM);
> 9333 gcc_assert (!(mode == CCFPmode || mode == CCFPEmode));
> 9334 if (REGNO (operands[2]) != REGNO (operands[0]))
> 9335 rc = reverse_condition (rc);
> 9336 else
> 9337 std::swap (operands[1], operands[2]);
> 9338
> 9339 operands[6] = gen_rtx_fmt_ee (rc, VOIDmode, operands[6],
Seems like the check on operands[2] should be:
if (!REG_P (operands[2]) || REGNO (operands[2]) != REGNO (operands[0]))
rc = reverse_condition (rc);
else
std::swap (operands[1], operands[2]);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
[not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-30 22:33 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-01 8:56 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-05 9:51 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-01 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2015-05-01
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35434
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35434&action=edit
Proposed fix
Could you please give this patch a try?
Unfortunately I don't have ada on my arm system so I can't try it out at the
moment.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
[not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-01 8:56 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-05 9:51 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-05 9:57 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: vries at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-05 9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955
--- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #5)
> Created attachment 35434 [details]
> Proposed fix
>
> Could you please give this patch a try?
> Unfortunately I don't have ada on my arm system so I can't try it out at the
> moment.
I managed to complete a bootstrap using the patch.
I'm now doing a nobootstrap build and test with and without the patch.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
[not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-05 9:51 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-05 9:57 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-05 10:16 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: vries at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-05 9:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955
--- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #6)
> I'm now doing a nobootstrap build and test with and without the patch.
I have reproduced the failure using the nobootstrap build:
...
build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran
-Bbuild/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../
-Bbuild/arm-linux-gnueabihf/./libgfortran/
src/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr43984.f90 -fno-diagnostics-show-caret
-fdiagnostics-color=never -O -O2 -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fdump-tree-pre -S -o
pr43984.s
src/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr43984.f90:49:0: internal compiler error: RTL
check: expected code 'reg', have 'const_int' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1710
0x886fd5 rtl_check_failed_code1(rtx_def const*, rtx_code, char const*, int,
char const*)
src/gcc/rtl.c:731
0xcd9c25 rhs_regno
src/gcc/rtl.h:1710
0xd0f6bb gen_split_2634(rtx_insn*, rtx_def**)
src/gcc/config/arm/arm.md:9341
0x110a23d split_7
src/gcc/config/arm/arm.md:9326
0x1118f0f split_12
src/gcc/config/arm/neon.md:4372
0x111fd37 split_insns(rtx_def*, rtx_def*)
src/gcc/config/arm/sync.md:379
0x4f0d59 try_split(rtx_def*, rtx_def*, int)
src/gcc/emit-rtl.c:3664
0x81e53b split_insn
src/gcc/recog.c:2919
0x81e925 split_all_insns()
src/gcc/recog.c:3009
0x8215e1 rest_of_handle_split_after_reload
src/gcc/recog.c:3956
0x821625 execute
src/gcc/recog.c:3985
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
compiler exited with status 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr43984.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr43984.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
[not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-05 9:57 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-05 10:16 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-05 10:23 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-05 10:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955
--- Comment #8 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #7)
> (In reply to vries from comment #6)
> > I'm now doing a nobootstrap build and test with and without the patch.
>
> I have reproduced the failure using the nobootstrap build:
<snip>
>
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr43984.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr43984.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
> ...
You mean without my patch, right? (hopefully ;))
I can't reproduce it on my cross build with
-mthumb/-march=armv7-a/-mfloat-abi=hard/-mfpu=vfpv3-d16 unfortunately
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
[not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-05 10:16 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-05 10:23 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-05 10:51 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: vries at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-05 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955
--- Comment #9 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #8)
> (In reply to vries from comment #7)
> > (In reply to vries from comment #6)
> > > I'm now doing a nobootstrap build and test with and without the patch.
> >
> > I have reproduced the failure using the nobootstrap build:
>
> <snip>
>
> >
> > FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr43984.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
> > FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr43984.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
> > ...
>
> You mean without my patch, right? (hopefully ;))
Yes :)
> I can't reproduce it on my cross build with
> -mthumb/-march=armv7-a/-mfloat-abi=hard/-mfpu=vfpv3-d16 unfortunately
with checking=yes,rtl?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
[not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-05 10:23 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-05 10:51 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-06 13:20 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-05 10:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955
--- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> > I can't reproduce it on my cross build with
> > -mthumb/-march=armv7-a/-mfloat-abi=hard/-mfpu=vfpv3-d16 unfortunately
>
> with checking=yes,rtl?
Ah yes, with --enable-checking=yes,rtl I can reproduce it, and confirm that it
goes away with the patch.
I have posted the patch at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-05/msg00284.html
Thanks for investigating!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
[not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-05 10:51 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-06 13:20 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-12 9:15 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: vries at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-06 13:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955
--- Comment #11 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #6)
> I'm now doing a nobootstrap build and test with and without the patch.
Test results:
...
$ diff -I guality -u FAILs.222758 FAILs.222758.patched
--- FAILs.222758 2015-05-05 19:07:39.000000000 +0800
+++ FAILs.222758.patched 2015-05-06 21:14:10.000000000 +0800
@@ -374,12 +379,6 @@
nobootstrap/build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.sum:FAIL:
gfortran.dg/class_allocate_18.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
execution test
nobootstrap/build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.sum:FAIL:
gfortran.dg/class_allocate_18.f90 -O3 -g execution test
nobootstrap/build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.sum:FAIL:
gfortran.dg/class_allocate_18.f90 -Os execution test
-nobootstrap/build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.sum:FAIL:
gfortran.dg/pr43984.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
-nobootstrap/build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.sum:FAIL:
gfortran.dg/pr43984.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
-nobootstrap/build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.sum:FAIL:
gfortran.dg/transfer_array_intrinsic_3.f90 -Os (internal compiler error)
-nobootstrap/build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.sum:FAIL:
gfortran.dg/transfer_array_intrinsic_3.f90 -Os (test for excess errors)
-nobootstrap/build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.sum:FAIL:
gfortran.dg/transfer_assumed_size_1.f90 -Os (internal compiler error)
-nobootstrap/build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.sum:FAIL:
gfortran.dg/transfer_assumed_size_1.f90 -Os (test for excess errors)
nobootstrap/build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.sum:FAIL:
gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_6.f90 -O0 execution test
nobootstrap/build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.sum:FAIL:
gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_6.f90 -O1 execution test
nobootstrap/build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.sum:FAIL:
gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_6.f90 -O2 execution test
...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
[not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-06 13:20 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-12 9:15 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-12 9:21 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-12 9:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955
--- Comment #12 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue May 12 09:15:09 2015
New Revision: 223049
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223049&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] Fix PR 65955: Do not take REGNO on non-REG operand in movcond_addsi
PR target/65955
* config/arm/arm.md (movcond_addsi): Check that operands[2] is a
REG before taking its REGNO.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/arm/arm.md
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
[not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-12 9:15 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-12 9:21 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-13 15:01 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-12 9:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to work| |6.0
Target Milestone|--- |5.2
Known to fail| |4.9.3, 5.0
--- Comment #13 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed on trunk. Will be backporting if testing on trunk shows no problem and
testing on branches goes ok
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
[not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-12 9:21 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-13 15:01 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-13 15:03 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-14 14:28 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-13 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955
--- Comment #14 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Wed May 13 15:00:50 2015
New Revision: 223165
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223165&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] Fix PR 65955: Do not take REGNO on non-REG operand in movcond_addsi
Backport from mainline
2015-05-12 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
PR target/65955
* config/arm/arm.md (movcond_addsi): Check that operands[2] is a
REG before taking its REGNO.
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/config/arm/arm.md
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
[not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-13 15:01 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-13 15:03 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-14 14:28 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-13 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to fail|5.0 |5.1.0
--- Comment #15 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Backported to GCC 5.
4.9 is next up after testing
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug target/65955] [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
[not found] <bug-65955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-13 15:03 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-14 14:28 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-14 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #17 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Should now be fixed on GCC 6, 5 and 4.9 branches.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread