From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-485182-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 58296 invoked by alias); 1 May 2015 11:45:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 58243 invoked by uid 48); 1 May 2015 11:45:50 -0000
From: "alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/65962] New: Missed vectorization of strided stores
Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 11:45:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status keywords bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-65962-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65962

            Bug ID: 65962
           Summary: Missed vectorization of strided stores
           Product: gcc
           Version: 5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: missed-optimization
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: middle-end
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

This does not vectorize at -O3 on x86_64/-mavx or aarch64:
int
loop (int *data)
{
  int tot = 0;
  for (int i = 0; i < 256; i++)
    data[i * 2] += 7;
  return tot;
}

-fdump-tree-vect-details reveals:

loadstore.c:6:3: note: === vect_analyze_data_ref_accesses ===
loadstore.c:6:3: note: Detected single element interleaving *_8 step 8
loadstore.c:6:3: note: Data access with gaps requires scalar epilogue loop
loadstore.c:6:3: note: not consecutive access *_8 = _10;

loadstore.c:6:3: note: not vectorized: complicated access pattern.
loadstore.c:6:3: note: bad data access.

However, a similar testcase that only reads from those locations, vectorizes
ok:
int
loop_12 (int *data)
{
  int tot = 0;
  for (int i = 0; i < 256; i++)
    tot += data[i * 2];
  return tot;
}
blocksort.c:6:3: note: === vect_analyze_data_ref_accesses ===
blocksort.c:6:3: note: Detected single element interleaving *_7 step 8
blocksort.c:6:3: note: Data access with gaps requires scalar epilogue loop